Not if you block all attachments. ;-)

 

From: Jon Harris [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 10:46 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: OT: SharePoint design

 

So true so true, sigh.

 

Jon

On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Andy Shook <[email protected]> wrote:

OK.  Sharepoint is IIS on steroids with everything stored in a SQL backend.
Keep that framework in mind as you design and also accept that you will
_NEVER_ get rid of email as file transport.  EVER. 

 

Shook

 

From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 1:39 PM 


To: NT System Admin Issues

Subject: RE: OT: SharePoint design 

 

I am fine with public discussion, so here is where I am starting from.

 

Currently we have multiple sites, each with at least one file server.  Each
file server is home for user profiles and a large number of shares.  Users
share documents across sites and across VPN from these shares.  Obviously it
is a nightmare with locked files, deleted files, permissions, and bandwidth.
Bandwidth is 45mpbs Internet (VPN) and sites range from 12mpbs to 6mpbs
(MPLS).  

 

My Exchange store is nearing 300GB.  My goal as stated before it to
eliminate Outlook as file transport and also make it easier for users to
share files from their pages.  

 

What I need to understand better is where the files will be stored in SP and
if it would make sense to have only one main SP server (probably a cluster).
At this point, it seems one would be the best option with a large storage
array.

 

I would like to hear about implementations some of you have running now and
how you might do it differently, or if you are happy with how it is working
as you designed.

 

Thanks to all!

 

From: paul chinnery [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 1:30 PM 


To: NT System Admin Issues

Subject: RE: OT: SharePoint design

 

+1

  _____  

Subject: RE: OT: SharePoint design
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 13:20:27 -0400
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]

I'd like to see the discussion here, rather than by offline phone call. we
are wading in to SharePoint as well and would like to hear any tips and/or
war stories.

 

-sc

 

From: Jon Harris [mailto:[email protected]] 

Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 12:36 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: OT: SharePoint design

 

Before you get started make a decision on which one you will use, Sharepoint
Services or Sharepoint server.  It will make a difference with the design
and what you can do later.

 

Jon

On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Bob Fronk <[email protected]> wrote:

I am heading into a SharePoint rollout to help with our file share nightmare
and "Outlook as a file transport" problems.
 
Data is at multiple sites.
 
If any SharePoint experts out there would be able to discuss this with me
via email or phone call, please contact me off list at:
[email protected]
 
Thanks.
 
Bob

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  _____  

HotmailR is up to 70% faster. Now good news travels really fast. Try it now.
<http://windowslive.com/online/hotmail?ocid=PID23391::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:
WM_HYGN_faster:082009>  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to