Wow you are still dealing with that guy? On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Jon Harris <[email protected]> wrote:
> That is not up to me and I doubt I could get management by in to that one > anyway. Upper mangement is on a Mac all the rest of us are on PC's. He > does not like connecting to the Windows network as it might infect his > system with something, then tells us that the Mac can't get infected because > it is so secure out of the box. > > Jon > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Jacob <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Not if you block all attachments… ;-) >> >> >> >> *From:* Jon Harris [mailto:[email protected]] >> *Sent:* Thursday, August 27, 2009 10:46 AM >> *To:* NT System Admin Issues >> *Subject:* Re: OT: SharePoint design >> >> >> >> So true so true, sigh. >> >> >> >> Jon >> >> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Andy Shook <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> OK. Sharepoint is IIS on steroids with everything stored in a SQL >> backend. Keep that framework in mind as you design and also accept that you >> will _*NEVER*_ get rid of email as file transport. EVER. >> >> >> >> Shook >> >> >> >> *From:* Bob Fronk [mailto:[email protected]] >> *Sent:* Thursday, August 27, 2009 1:39 PM >> >> >> *To:* NT System Admin Issues >> >> *Subject:* RE: OT: SharePoint design >> >> >> >> I am fine with public discussion, so here is where I am starting from. >> >> >> >> Currently we have multiple sites, each with at least one file server. >> Each file server is home for user profiles and a large number of shares. >> Users share documents across sites and across VPN from these shares. >> Obviously it is a nightmare with locked files, deleted files, permissions, >> and bandwidth. Bandwidth is 45mpbs Internet (VPN) and sites range from >> 12mpbs to 6mpbs (MPLS). >> >> >> >> My Exchange store is nearing 300GB. My goal as stated before it to >> eliminate Outlook as file transport and also make it easier for users to >> share files from their pages. >> >> >> >> What I need to understand better is where the files will be stored in SP >> and if it would make sense to have only one main SP server (probably a >> cluster). At this point, it seems one would be the best option with a large >> storage array. >> >> >> >> I would like to hear about implementations some of you have running now >> and how you might do it differently, or if you are happy with how it is >> working as you designed. >> >> >> >> Thanks to all! >> >> >> >> *From:* paul chinnery [mailto:[email protected]] >> *Sent:* Thursday, August 27, 2009 1:30 PM >> >> >> *To:* NT System Admin Issues >> >> *Subject:* RE: OT: SharePoint design >> >> >> >> +1 >> ------------------------------ >> >> Subject: RE: OT: SharePoint design >> Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 13:20:27 -0400 >> From: [email protected] >> To: [email protected] >> >> I’d like to see the discussion here, rather than by offline phone call… we >> are wading in to SharePoint as well and would like to hear any tips and/or >> war stories. >> >> >> >> -sc >> >> >> >> *From:* Jon Harris [mailto:[email protected]] >> >> *Sent:* Thursday, August 27, 2009 12:36 PM >> *To:* NT System Admin Issues >> *Subject:* Re: OT: SharePoint design >> >> >> >> Before you get started make a decision on which one you will use, >> Sharepoint Services or Sharepoint server. It will make a difference with >> the design and what you can do later. >> >> >> >> Jon >> >> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Bob Fronk <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I am heading into a SharePoint rollout to help with our file share >> nightmare and “Outlook as a file transport” problems. >> >> Data is at multiple sites. >> >> If any SharePoint experts out there would be able to discuss this with me >> via email or phone call, please contact me off list at: >> [email protected] >> >> Thanks. >> >> Bob >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Hotmail® is up to 70% faster. Now good news travels really fast. Try it >> now.<http://windowslive.com/online/hotmail?ocid=PID23391::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HYGN_faster:082009> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
