Thanks but I get myself into enough hot water just managing a Windows network. I don't need to push this guys buttons any more than absolutely possible. The fact that we bought 2 Windows laptops for less than one Mac and with the difference large enough to purchase another Windows laptop, kind of got his goat.
Jon On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 5:16 PM, David Lum <[email protected]> wrote: > Ohh good catch on the the first one yeah, sorry I should have disclaimered > it, my bad. > > 2nd link was current as of today, however, and in fact this is an ever > better link as it cover just 2009 to date: > http://secunia.com/advisories/product/96/?task=statistics_2009 > > Kind of kills the "Mac can't get infected because it is so secure out of > the box". > > For me I'd just be happy if they (the Mac zealots) say "it's less likely > to.." > > Dave > > -----Original Message----- > From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 2:07 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: Re: Mac not secure (was RE: OT: SharePoint design) > > **COUGH** 2004?! > > -- > ME2 > > > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 4:43 PM, David Lum<[email protected]> wrote: > > They really feels that way? Print these out. > > > > > > > > "Windows is more secure than you think, and Mac OS X is worse than you > ever > > imagined. That is according to statistics published for the first time > this > > week by Danish security firm Secunia" > > > > http://news.techworld.com/security/1798/mac-os-x-security-myth-exposed/ > > > > > > > > http://secunia.com/advisories/product/96/?task=statistics > > > > > > > > Dave > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Jon Harris [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 1:32 PM > > To: NT System Admin Issues > > Subject: Re: OT: SharePoint design > > > > > > > > That is not up to me and I doubt I could get management by in to that one > > anyway. Upper mangement is on a Mac all the rest of us are on PC's. He > > does not like connecting to the Windows network as it might infect his > > system with something, then tells us that the Mac can't get infected > because > > it is so secure out of the box. > > > > > > > > Jon > > > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Jacob <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Not if you block all attachments. ;-) > > > > > > > > From: Jon Harris [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 10:46 AM > > > > To: NT System Admin Issues > > Subject: Re: OT: SharePoint design > > > > > > > > So true so true, sigh. > > > > > > > > Jon > > > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Andy Shook <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > OK. Sharepoint is IIS on steroids with everything stored in a SQL > backend. > > Keep that framework in mind as you design and also accept that you will > > _NEVER_ get rid of email as file transport. EVER. > > > > > > > > Shook > > > > > > > > From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[email protected]] > > > > Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 1:39 PM > > > > To: NT System Admin Issues > > > > Subject: RE: OT: SharePoint design > > > > > > > > I am fine with public discussion, so here is where I am starting from. > > > > > > > > Currently we have multiple sites, each with at least one file server. > Each > > file server is home for user profiles and a large number of shares. > Users > > share documents across sites and across VPN from these shares. Obviously > it > > is a nightmare with locked files, deleted files, permissions, and > > bandwidth. Bandwidth is 45mpbs Internet (VPN) and sites range from > 12mpbs > > to 6mpbs (MPLS). > > > > > > > > My Exchange store is nearing 300GB. My goal as stated before it to > > eliminate Outlook as file transport and also make it easier for users to > > share files from their pages. > > > > > > > > What I need to understand better is where the files will be stored in SP > and > > if it would make sense to have only one main SP server (probably a > > cluster). At this point, it seems one would be the best option with a > large > > storage array. > > > > > > > > I would like to hear about implementations some of you have running now > and > > how you might do it differently, or if you are happy with how it is > working > > as you designed. > > > > > > > > Thanks to all! > > > > > > > > From: paul chinnery [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 1:30 PM > > > > To: NT System Admin Issues > > > > Subject: RE: OT: SharePoint design > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > ________________________________ > > > > Subject: RE: OT: SharePoint design > > Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 13:20:27 -0400 > > From: [email protected] > > To: [email protected] > > > > I'd like to see the discussion here, rather than by offline phone call. > we > > are wading in to SharePoint as well and would like to hear any tips > and/or > > war stories. > > > > > > > > -sc > > > > > > > > From: Jon Harris [mailto:[email protected]] > > > > Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 12:36 PM > > To: NT System Admin Issues > > Subject: Re: OT: SharePoint design > > > > > > > > Before you get started make a decision on which one you will use, > Sharepoint > > Services or Sharepoint server. It will make a difference with the design > > and what you can do later. > > > > > > > > Jon > > > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Bob Fronk <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I am heading into a SharePoint rollout to help with our file share > nightmare > > and "Outlook as a file transport" problems. > > > > Data is at multiple sites. > > > > If any SharePoint experts out there would be able to discuss this with me > > via email or phone call, please contact me off list at: > > [email protected] > > > > Thanks. > > > > Bob > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > Hotmail® is up to 70% faster. Now good news travels really fast. Try it > now. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
