LOL - understood. I don't think I'd want your job... :)
From: Jon Harris [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 2:30 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Mac not secure (was RE: OT: SharePoint design) Thanks but I get myself into enough hot water just managing a Windows network. I don't need to push this guys buttons any more than absolutely possible. The fact that we bought 2 Windows laptops for less than one Mac and with the difference large enough to purchase another Windows laptop, kind of got his goat. Jon On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 5:16 PM, David Lum <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Ohh good catch on the the first one yeah, sorry I should have disclaimered it, my bad. 2nd link was current as of today, however, and in fact this is an ever better link as it cover just 2009 to date: http://secunia.com/advisories/product/96/?task=statistics_2009 Kind of kills the "Mac can't get infected because it is so secure out of the box". For me I'd just be happy if they (the Mac zealots) say "it's less likely to.." Dave -----Original Message----- From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 2:07 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Mac not secure (was RE: OT: SharePoint design) **COUGH** 2004?! -- ME2 On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 4:43 PM, David Lum<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > They really feels that way? Print these out. > > > > "Windows is more secure than you think, and Mac OS X is worse than you ever > imagined. That is according to statistics published for the first time this > week by Danish security firm Secunia" > > http://news.techworld.com/security/1798/mac-os-x-security-myth-exposed/ > > > > http://secunia.com/advisories/product/96/?task=statistics > > > > Dave > > > > > > From: Jon Harris [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] > Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 1:32 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: Re: OT: SharePoint design > > > > That is not up to me and I doubt I could get management by in to that one > anyway. Upper mangement is on a Mac all the rest of us are on PC's. He > does not like connecting to the Windows network as it might infect his > system with something, then tells us that the Mac can't get infected because > it is so secure out of the box. > > > > Jon > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Jacob > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Not if you block all attachments. ;-) > > > > From: Jon Harris [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] > Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 10:46 AM > > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: Re: OT: SharePoint design > > > > So true so true, sigh. > > > > Jon > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Andy Shook > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > OK. Sharepoint is IIS on steroids with everything stored in a SQL backend. > Keep that framework in mind as you design and also accept that you will > _NEVER_ get rid of email as file transport. EVER. > > > > Shook > > > > From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] > > Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 1:39 PM > > To: NT System Admin Issues > > Subject: RE: OT: SharePoint design > > > > I am fine with public discussion, so here is where I am starting from. > > > > Currently we have multiple sites, each with at least one file server. Each > file server is home for user profiles and a large number of shares. Users > share documents across sites and across VPN from these shares. Obviously it > is a nightmare with locked files, deleted files, permissions, and > bandwidth. Bandwidth is 45mpbs Internet (VPN) and sites range from 12mpbs > to 6mpbs (MPLS). > > > > My Exchange store is nearing 300GB. My goal as stated before it to > eliminate Outlook as file transport and also make it easier for users to > share files from their pages. > > > > What I need to understand better is where the files will be stored in SP and > if it would make sense to have only one main SP server (probably a > cluster). At this point, it seems one would be the best option with a large > storage array. > > > > I would like to hear about implementations some of you have running now and > how you might do it differently, or if you are happy with how it is working > as you designed. > > > > Thanks to all! > > > > From: paul chinnery [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] > Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 1:30 PM > > To: NT System Admin Issues > > Subject: RE: OT: SharePoint design > > > > +1 > > ________________________________ > > Subject: RE: OT: SharePoint design > Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 13:20:27 -0400 > From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > To: > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > > I'd like to see the discussion here, rather than by offline phone call. we > are wading in to SharePoint as well and would like to hear any tips and/or > war stories. > > > > -sc > > > > From: Jon Harris [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] > > Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 12:36 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: Re: OT: SharePoint design > > > > Before you get started make a decision on which one you will use, Sharepoint > Services or Sharepoint server. It will make a difference with the design > and what you can do later. > > > > Jon > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Bob Fronk > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > I am heading into a SharePoint rollout to help with our file share nightmare > and "Outlook as a file transport" problems. > > Data is at multiple sites. > > If any SharePoint experts out there would be able to discuss this with me > via email or phone call, please contact me off list at: > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > > Thanks. > > Bob > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > Hotmail(r) is up to 70% faster. Now good news travels really fast. Try it now. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
