Fair enough!

Thanks to everyone for the responses.

- Sean

On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Joseph Heaton <[email protected]> wrote:

> One of the tools I had in my fiber toolkit was a magnifier.  It's
> specifically designed for fiber connectors.  It has an internal light source
> and will magnify the surface of the fiber well enough to see if there are
> problems at the fiber ends.  As far as internally, it's pretty much
> plug-n-pray, with the flashlight trick letting you know if light is at least
> getting through, which would rule out a total break.  But to be honest,
> fiber patch cables are pretty darn tough, for the most part.  Just don't
> crimp them in a cabinet door...
>
> >>> Sean Martin <[email protected]> 9/23/2009 3:32 PM >>>
> Honestly, I'd never thought of that. Does it actually work? I guess my
> concern is that it wouldn't identify all possible imperfections within the
> strand. I'm no fiber expert, but my understanding is that light impulses
> basically bounce down each strand, and that is why sharp bends in fiber can
> cause problems because those light impulses can end up being reflected out
> of order, depending how they strike that bend. I would imagine a constant
> light source may still be able to travel the strand even if minor fractures
> existed, where data transmission could be negatively affected.
>
> Are my concerns valid? Is there a reasonably priced device to verify the
> integrity of a fiber cable, or am I just going to have to try the flash
> light trick and then plug n pray?
>
> - Sean
>
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 1:34 PM, James Kerr <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >  Can't you just shine a light through one end and see if theres light on
> > the other end? ;-)
> >
> >  ----- Original Message -----
>  > *From:* Sean Martin <[email protected]>
> > *To:* NT System Admin Issues <[email protected]>
> >  *Sent:* Wednesday, September 23, 2009 5:27 PM
> > *Subject:* Re: Fiber Cable Tester
> >
> >   We just completed a Data Center migration and I have a whole box full
> of
> > cables that were pulled from the old location. These are mostly LC-LC
> cables
> > from servers to fiber switches. Nothing over 30 meters. I was just
> looking
> > for a device that would tell me whether or not the cables were still good
> > (no breaks, etc.). I certainly don't need anything along the lines of an
> > OTDR.
> >
> > - Sean
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Ben Scott <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Sean Martin <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Can anyone recommend a quality Fiber Optic cable tester?
> >>
> >>  I don't really know much about it, but I have been told by a couple
> >> installers that testing fiber isn't like testing copper.  There's no
> >> cross-talk or other fancy stuff like the copper testers do.  All they
> >> do is measure the power loss (in dB).  They do that by using a simple
> >> meter and a light source.  The measure the source to the meter, then
> >> they put the run in line, measure that, and take the difference.
> >>
> >>  Of course, the installers could have been full of sh*t.  They often
> are.
> >>
> >>  I do know that an OTDR (Optical Time-Domain Reflectometer) is an
> >> expensive gadget, but all it does is tell you how long the cable is,
> >> or where the break is, if it's broken.  That's very useful if you're
> >> looking to find a break to put in a repair splice, but it's useless
> >> for quality acceptance purposes.
> >>
> >> -- Ben
> >>
> >> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> >> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to