80% of the calls you can successfully send elsewhere as you can write the flow 
chart for it. 20% require actual troubleshooting, planning, analysis, etc. 
These are the ones that trip people up as they get stuck in ratholes in far 
away places. One of the ways to find these real quickly is to go in the 
ticketing tool and report on (Ticket Bounces > N) where N is something like 4 
or 5. This is how many times the ticket has been transferred between queues. 
These are the clueless ticket jockeys in the queues blaming each other to get 
it off their plate.

Thanks,
Brian Desmond
[email protected]

c - 312.731.3132

From: Ray [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 12:55 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outsourcing Discussion

I'm guessing by "outsourcing" you mean going out of the country.  I'm fairly 
certain India is a major source of call centers.  In my experience, it's been 
technical support of some kind.

Our experience with MS support has been with mixed results on several products, 
most recently SCCM.   I don't know if the support would've been better out of 
Redmond.  I guess we just assume it will be.

The only justification I can think of is money, pure and simple.   Silly 
Americans want things like benefits, particularly healthcare.

Having managed a couple help desks in the past, at least in my experience the 
large majority of calls are pretty darn simple.    Many support organizations 
have multi-tier support because they know few calls need the best of the best 
to get it solved.  So  companies can get a whole lot of "good enough" headcount 
to field the majority of calls for significantly lower costs.


From: Richard Stovall [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 6:14 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outsourcing Discussion

That's wild.  My few experiences with Microsoft PSS have been uniformly good 
(and, knock wood, infrequent), even if I've started with an overseas 
technician.  I've always gotten a 'personal' e-mail address that I can reply 
directly to, and post-incident follow up later on from the tech.  The only 
thing is that I've never had to call except within the context of the partner 
company where I used to work full time.  Maybe they have a different queue for 
partners?

Our VMWare support was purchased through an HP SKU and I've also always 
received excellent support from HP's South Asian techs. Again, the few times 
I've had to call I've gotten a live person on the phone within 3 or 4 minutes - 
several times with no wait at all.  If they need to escalate they do, and if 
they need to bring in the hardware guys with questions about the EVA they can 
get someone on the phone immediately.

And thinking about the EVA, I do want to throw a shout out to HP's storage 
support folks.  This particular division does not seem to be outsourced, and in 
my experience are uniformly terrific.  If you've got something that stumps the 
first level folks, you get put through immediately to some seriously high-level 
storage geeks who work support from their houses.  It's almost scary how much 
they know and how well they know it.  I have my beefs with HP, but not with 
their storage support.

From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 8:14 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outsourcing Discussion

Wow, where to start ?  Which scenario to describe ?

Try placing a call to Microsoft for support.  With my Technet Plus 
subscription, I get two 'free' support incidents per year.  But I have never, 
NEVER gotten direct contact with any tech support.  At best, I have spent 15 to 
20 minutes on the phone with someone in the Aisian subcontinent ( India, I 
think ) whose sole purpose is to gather information based on a script as 
'triage' ... unfortunately, this first contact has zero technical skills, and 
even worse command of the English language.  Neither do they explain up front 
that they are only gathering information and in no way can help.

Then, when least convenient ( it seems ) a first level tech from Microsoft 
calls, usually getting voice mail, and leaves a message.  I'm sure it's a 
message, but most times I can not tell what they are saying, nor what their 
name is.  WHO am I supposed to ask for when I return the call ?  No idea, 
cannot make out the name, and nothing sounds familiar.   I finally get through 
to a live tech, and back to the script.  Have to repeat steps I have already 
gone through, and told the first triage operator that I've done.  Have to ask  
the tech to repeat himself several times since his speech is unintelligible to 
me.  Have to ask him repeatedly to slow down his speech for the same reason.  
First level tech has NO clue and continues to make beginner suggestions, 
doesn't listen at all to my feedback.  45 minutes into the call repeats himself 
asking me to do something he asked 30 minutes ago, but didn't make note of.

I ask to be escalated to a supervisor, but from the sound of things, it's like 
the call center has been trained to transfer the call to the rep sitting next 
to him and *say* it's a supervisor.  At times I wonder how much training the 
person on the other end of the phone has.  It seems zero experience, and 
probably a week of training, some of which is *supposed* to be phone skills.  
But repeatedly it seems that the tech rep is only reading from a scripted flow 
chart and not from any intelligent train of thought.

And I don't know why, but in the Aisian subcontinent, they seem to say 'OK' a 
LOT, even when it's NOT OK.  As in , "I would like to remote control your 
client's system, and make some changes during production hours, and might loose 
all their data, OK ?"

I'm SURE that the hourly rate for outsourcing to a 'third world' country is 
much, much lower than here in the U.S., and up front looks like an attractive 
proposition for cutting cost.  I'm not so sure that anyone can properly see the 
potential for disatisified customers, and destruction of brand loyalty that 
results.  Nor do they fully understand the ramifications of not being able to 
hold an overseas outsource company to SLA contracts, nor guarantee any security 
of data that they obtain during this process.  No one seems concerned with the 
job loss in the U.S. as a result, nor the impact of U.S. workers losing their 
jobs and no longer have disposable income to pump into the local economy.  Nor 
do they consider the impact of monetary influx to an unstable region of the 
world.

I will not work with at least one firewall appliance company now due to 
repeated bad experiences with their overseas outsourced support, when I was a 
big proponent of their products before the outsourcing.  And I refused any 
further purchases from a large pc and server company for similar support 
disatisfactions, and seems they brought business line support back to the U.S. 
even though home/individual consumers are still made to suffer.

This barely scratches the surface of my experiences and frustrations with the 
results of outsourcing.

Erik Goldoff

IT  Consultant

Systems, Networks, & Security


________________________________
From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 8:58 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Outsourcing Discussion
Guys and gals,

I've returned to college this fall after about 15 years to finally finish up a 
degree I started on about 25 years ago.  One of my classes this semester is 
Macro Economics.  Last night my professor gave us an essay question for a test 
next Monday that is potentially 50% or more of our test grade.  The topic is on 
outsourcing and I wanted to toss this out for discussion, input, personal 
experiences etc etc.  The questions I have to answer are:

What is the economic justification given for outsourcing?
Where is the outsourcing taking place?  (Obviously, I'm focusing on the IT 
field, specifically technical support)
What types of jobs are these workers performing?
What is the benefit to the business?  To foreign workers?

I talked with my professor and told her what approach I wanted to take, from 
the end user perspective, and that I had experienced the tech support being 
outsourced.  She liked that idea a lot.  Obviously, I will be looking for other 
news articles to support my essay.  What I'm looking for is thoughts, opinions, 
personal experiences from an end user perspective, has anyone here been 
outsourced?  What was that like?  I'm just taking an informal poll from a group 
of my peers that I know has had personal experience in some way with this 
subject.

Try to keep it on topic, I did get Stu's OK before sending this, so a big 
Thanks Stu for the use of these lists to help with my exam.
--
Sherry Abercrombie

"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
Arthur C. Clarke
Sent from Haltom City, TX, United States

















~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to