In my opinion, we're on the cusp of seeing solid state storage becoming the norm and we will be able to put hard drives out to pasture or use them more for backups than tapes. Although we have much faster hard disks nowadays than ever, it's amazing that we are still at the behest of such a mechanical device for our mission / business critical data. Solid state FTW.
Regards, Andrew 2009/10/17 Angus Scott-Fleming <[email protected]> > Scaremongering, or legitimate things to worry about? Lots of the > "Talkback" > comments are that ZDNet is over the top these days, but it seems to me he's > got > some legitimate points. > > ------- Included Stuff Follows ------- > Why RAID 5 stops working in 2009 | Storage Bits | ZDNet.com > > Disks fail > While disks are incredibly reliable devices, they do fail. Our best data > - > from CMU and Google - finds that over 3% of drives fail each year in the > first three years of drive life, and then failure rates start rising > fast. > > With 7 brand new disks, you have ~20% chance of seeing a disk failure > each > year. Factor in the rising failure rate with age and over 4 years you > are > almost certain to see a disk failure during the life of those disks. > > But you´re protected by RAID 5, right? Not in 2009. > > Reads fail > SATA drives are commonly specified with an unrecoverable read error rate > (URE) of 10^14. Which means that once every 100,000,000,000,000 bits, > the > disk will very politely tell you that, so sorry, but I really, truly > can´t > read that sector back to you. > > One hundred trillion bits is about 12 terabytes. Sound like a lot? Not > in > 2009. > > Disk capacities double > Disk drive capacities double every 18-24 months. We have 1 TB drives > now, > and in 2009 we´ll have 2 TB drives. > > With a 7 drive RAID 5 disk failure, you´ll have 6 remaining 2 TB drives. > As the RAID controller is busily reading through those 6 disks to > reconstruct the data from the failed drive, it is almost certain it will > see an URE. > > So the read fails. And when that happens, you are one unhappy camper. > The > message "we can´t read this RAID volume" travels up the chain of command > until an error message is presented on the screen. 12 TB of your > carefully > protected - you thought! - data is gone. Oh, you didn´t back it up to > tape? Bummer! > > --------- Included Stuff Ends --------- > More here with links: http://blogs.zdnet.com/storage/?p=162 > > > -- > Angus Scott-Fleming > GeoApps, Tucson, Arizona > 1-520-290-5038 > +-----------------------------------+ > > > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
