Doing it, or discussing it? :-)
From: James Rankin [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 10:46 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Stupid user tricks! Big can of worms there..... On 23 February 2010 15:41, John Hornbuckle <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: This is a classic battle between users and sysadmins. Although I do occasionally wonder if we shouldn’t reconsider our stance and give users more flexibility in how they use e-mail. Maybe if they want to use e-mail for file transfers and storage, we should let them… John Hornbuckle MIS Department Taylor County School District www.taylor.k12.fl.us<http://www.taylor.k12.fl.us> From: John Aldrich [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 10:30 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Stupid user tricks! I just had to talk to a user who’d tried to send himself two messages with 13 megs of attachments on each email. And he was wondering why his POP email was timing out! GAH! Stupid Users‼ Email is NOT designed for transferring files‼ </RANT> Sorry… had to get that off my chest! [cid:[email protected]][cid:[email protected]] NOTICE: Florida has a broad public records law. Most written communications to or from this entity are public records that will be disclosed to the public and the media upon request. E-mail communications may be subject to public disclosure. -- "On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question." NOTICE: Florida has a broad public records law. Most written communications to or from this entity are public records that will be disclosed to the public and the media upon request. E-mail communications may be subject to public disclosure. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
<<inline: image001.jpg>>
<<inline: image002.jpg>>
