I'm guessing the 10,000 RPM will perform better even with less disk buffer
because it spins faster and doesn't need the buffer so much. But I am
prepared for someone to blow my preconceptions out of the window...

On 28 February 2010 15:29, Sam Cayze <[email protected]> wrote:

>  I’m guessing the 10x RPM, but perhaps this may be of help:
> http://www.harddrivebenchmark.net/
>
> Sam
>
>
>
> *From:* HELP_PC [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Sunday, February 28, 2010 12:26 AM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Which is faster ?
>
>
>
>
>
> How can I decide if a Hard disk WD 10000 rpm 16 mb cache will perform
> better than a WD 7200 rpm with 64mb cache
> Looking fore somebody that already tested
>
> TIA
>
> *GuidoElia*
> *HELPPC*
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
Kind regards,

Andrew Levicki MCITP MCSE CCNA
[email protected]
www.andrewlevicki.eu

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to