Are you just running this with Direct attached storage or are you going on something like a SAN?
________________________________ From: Steve Ens <[email protected]> To: NT System Admin Issues <[email protected]> Sent: Fri, March 5, 2010 10:58:25 AM Subject: Re: EBS (Essential Business Server) is Dead Right, forgot about that barebones flavour. On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Michael B. Smith <[email protected]> wrote: Hmmmm? Hyper-V is free. > >Regards, > >Michael B. Smith >Consultant and Exchange MVP >http://TheEssentialExchange.com > >From:Steve Ens [mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 12:56 PM > > >To: NT System Admin Issues > >Subject: Re: EBS (Essential Business Server) is Dead > >Oh yeah? That is interesting. That means one extra license in each >deployment. Or do you have them all hosted on a datacenter server somewhere? >On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Michael B. Smith <[email protected]> >wrote: >I deploy my SBS customers now as a VM. They don’t know the difference – but I >sure do. J > >Regards, > >Michael B. Smith >Consultant and Exchange MVP >http://TheEssentialExchange.com > >From:Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 12:47 PM > >To: NT System Admin Issues >Subject:RE: EBS (Essential Business Server) is Dead > >If Microsoft was really on the ball, they would have taken the EBS 4 server >product model and virtualized the whole build. That way an organization could >go from their one SBS server to a single EBS server when the time came. There >is really no reason for SBS and EBS to be sold as DVDs in a package, they >should be VMs that are loaded onto a host. >Just my opinion though, >Tim > >From:Jon Harris [mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 11:35 AM >To: NT System Admin Issues >Subject: Re: EBS (Essential Business Server) is Dead > >In this economy I was wondering how long before it would die. Too many medium >size businesses seem to be either downsizing or just closing shop. Add >virtualization to the mix and it was kill for the product. It was a great >idea though. > >Jon >On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Tim Vander Kooi <[email protected]> wrote: >Great idea…Decent product…10 years too late. RIP >Tim > >From:David Baca [mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 10:57 AM > >To: NT System Admin Issues >Subject:Re: EBS (Essential Business Server) is Dead > >wow .. that did not last very long. > > ________________________________ >From:Michael B. Smith <[email protected]> >To: NT System Admin Issues <[email protected]> >Sent: Fri, March 5, 2010 8:19:15 AM >Subject: EBS (Essential Business Server) is Dead > >http://www.microsoft.com/ebs/en/us/default.aspx >http://blogs.technet.com/essentialbusinessserver/archive/2010/03/05/new-it-trends-bring-change-to-mid-market-product-line.aspx >http://www.chrisrue.com/funcave/2010/03/ebs-has-left-the-building.html > >Regards, > >Michael B. Smith >Consultant and Exchange MVP >http://TheEssentialExchange.com > > > >~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ >~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
