I have Sav and it just amazes me how much crap gets installed on a fresh install. I love the idea of AV at the perimeter, but it just doesn't seem sufficient enough to protect against all attack surfaces.
I seriously need to sit down and figure what I do on the desktop when renewal time comes around. On 3/11/10, Andrew S. Baker <[email protected]> wrote: > I hate them both, but even comparatively, you're going from bad to worse. > > Why not any of the plethora of other options? > > > ------Original Message------ > From: Joseph Heaton > To: NT Issues > ReplyTo: NT Issues > Subject: Changing AV from Symantec to Mcaffee - Good or Bad? > Sent: Mar 11, 2010 5:22 PM > > Discuss please. > > Personally, I'm very much against it. I've had a bad taste in my mouth for > McAfee from way back in the Code Red days... (72 hours to recover, 70 of > which I was in the server room) > > I also don't care for Symancrap, but that's mainly due to the bloat, and how > hard it is to get rid of... > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > > > > -ASB: http://xeesm.com/AndrewBaker > Sent from my Verizon Smartphone > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ -- Sent from my mobile device ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
