Isn't that a contract?


On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 3:53 PM, N Parr <[email protected]> wrote:

>  My Business Class line from Comcast has an SLA on it.  Doesn't mean it's
> honored but there is one.
>
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* Erik Goldoff [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 23, 2010 2:52 PM
>
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: National broadband
>
>    When I discuss this with clients that have replaced T1s and Frame-Relay
> with Broadband ( xDSL and Cable ) I tell them that ‘Up To’ begins with ZERO
> … and there is no SLA, no CIR like with Frame !
>
>
>
> *Erik Goldoff***
>
> *IT  Consultant*
>
> *Systems, Networks, & Security *
>
> '  Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! '
>
> *From:* John Hornbuckle [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 23, 2010 3:29 PM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: National broadband
>
>
>
> True that “up to” often means “less than.” But I use Comcast, and sometimes
> I get more than the advertised speed due to their “burst” technology (which
> really does seem to work, according to the results I get from
> SpeedTest.net). I really can’t complain overall, although other ISPs—or even
> the same ISP but in other areas—may be worse.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> John
>
>
>
> *From:* Jay Dale [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 23, 2010 3:21 PM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: National broadband
>
>
>
>
> http://www.pcworld.com/article/192128/the_real_truth_about_broadband_speeds.html
>
>
>
> *Jay Dale*
>
> I.T. Manager, 3GiG
>
> Mobile: 713.299.2541
>
> Email: [email protected] <[email protected]>
>
>
>
> Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, including any attached files, may
> contain confidential and/or privileged information for the sole use of the
> intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
> notified that any review, dissemination or copying of this e-mail and
> attachments, if any, or the information contained herein, is strictly
> prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive
> information for the intended recipient), please contact the sender by reply
> e-mail and delete all copies of this message.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* John Hornbuckle [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 18, 2010 1:21 PM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: National broadband
>
>
>
> I’m sure the telco had multiple reasons for going bankrupt, but losing
> customers to the cable company was probably a factor. Once the cable company
> started offering Internet, I contacted the telco before ditching DSL. I
> asked them if they planned on lowering their prices since I could now get
> much faster access for the same price from the cable company. They said no,
> and I immediately switched. I’m sure I wasn’t the only one.
>
>
>
> The telco had spent a fortune building little communication stations all
> over the county so that they’d have the infrastructure for DSL (since users
> can’t be more than whatever distance from that equipment for DSL to work).
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Murray Freeman [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 18, 2010 2:11 PM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: National broadband
>
>
>
> And the telco went bankrupt? I'm in AT&T and they are rolling out Uverse.
> As I understand it, since we have Comcast along with AT&T, FIOS will not be
> allowed in at this time!
>
>
>
> *MMF *
>
>
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* John Hornbuckle [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 18, 2010 12:41 PM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: National broadband
>
> The telco—the ones who refused to lower their prices despite the change to
> the competitive landscape.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Jon Harris [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 18, 2010 9:57 AM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: National broadband
>
>
>
> Which one the telco or the cable company?  Most people will not change just
> because they can.  There has to be a difference greater than the pain to
> change will cause.  How many people like to notify all of their contants
> that their email address has changed?  I see it all the time but most will
> not change unless the pain to stay gets to be more than the pain to change.
>
>
>
> Jon
>
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 9:50 AM, John Hornbuckle <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> Talking about no-brainers... In my area, DSL used to be the only broadband
> option. Eventually, the cable company started offering faster access for the
> same price. Do you think the local telco lowered their DSL rates, though?
> Nope. I guess they figured folks would keep paying the same price for slower
> speeds.
>
> They recently filed for bankruptcy protection.
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Aldrich [mailto:[email protected]]
>
> Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 9:49 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: National broadband
>
> Well, just checked and my ISP has 6 Mbit internet available for the same
> price I'm paying for 3 Mbit. No brainer here... I just ordered an upgrade.
> :-)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Aldrich [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 9:31 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: National broadband
>
> Geez! I'd be more than happy with 10-15Mbit speed, or even a "true" 6 Mbit.
> I don't have that option, AFAIK, with my ISP.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: hg [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 9:03 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: National broadband
>
> I always wonder the same thing. I even mentioned to two family members that
> there was an even lower unpublished tier available that would save then
> $20/month and after they changed to it they mentioned there was no
> noticeable difference.
>
> Always on, reasonably low latency and a couple Mb speed works for a lot of
> folks.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joseph Heaton [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 2:23 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: National broadband
>
> I agree John.  My big activities at home are playing MMOs, for the most
> part.  My Comcast connection at 6-12 Mb is just fine for that.  I'm not
> running a business out of my home or anything.
>
> What are people doing at home, for "personal" reasons, that would need 50 -
> 100 Mbps down, and 50ish Mbps up?
>
> >>> John Hornbuckle <[email protected]> 3/17/2010 11:08 AM
> >>>
> I feel like such a neoluddite... I get 10-15Mbps at home via cable modem,
> and honestly that's plenty fast for 99% of what I do.
>
>
>
> John Hornbuckle
> MIS Department
> Taylor County School District
> www.taylor.k12.fl.us
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Jay Dale [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 12:54 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: National broadband
>
> From what I gathered from this site, they just want to release the capping
> the ISP's do on the available bandwidth for the customers, not necessarily
> allow Internet for all citizens.  ISP's truly have a large amount of
> bandwidth available to consumers, yet to control pricing and overhead they
> cap speeds and gradually release them on an accounting-time-period-basis.
>
> I have AT&T at my home, and the highest Mbps down available is 24Mbps, but
> compared to a year ago, its twice as fast.  So it just happened to be
> available now instead of last year?
>
> If I were to pay $65/month for 100Mbps/50Mbps, I would gladly do it.  So
> long as it's available.  Knowing it's available yet being restricted is what
> is irritating.
>
>
> Jay Dale
> I.T. Manager, 3GiG
> Mobile: 713.299.2541
> Email: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
>
> Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, including any attached files, may
> contain confidential and/or privileged information for the sole use of the
> intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
> notified that any review, dissemination or copying of this e-mail and
> attachments, if any, or the information contained herein, is strictly
> prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive
> information for the intended recipient), please contact the sender by reply
> e-mail and delete all copies of this message.
>
>
> From: Jacob [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 10:40 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: National broadband
>
> I could run a cable up to you from our OC3... ;-)
>
> From: Jeff Johnson [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 11:51 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: National broadband
>
> Though I would love to see the US and all broadband providers give us
> better services, my concern is at what cost?
>
> If I look at my home service, 24 Mbps down and 1.5 up, is running $65.
>  That is pretty cheap, but still a LONG way from 100/50 Mbps.  I am really
> curious what the government feels is "affordable access"?  It would seem
> that only businesses would pay more than $100/month for service, but a
> business would require some type of SLA.  At my office, I COULD get 100 Mbps
> service, but have no idea what the price would be.  Considering 3 Mbps
> service is costing me $530 for a business line, I would not even want to
> consider the price.
>
>
> Jeff Johnson
> Systems Administrator
> 714-773-2600 Office
> 714-773-6351 Fax
> [cid:[email protected]]
>
> From: David Lum [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 11:39 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: National broadband
>
> Thoughts, comments?
>
> http://www.broadband.gov/
> David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER
> NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION
> (Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> NOTICE: Florida has a broad public records law. Most written communications
> to or from this entity are public records that will be disclosed to the
> public and the media upon request. E-mail communications may be subject to
> public disclosure.
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
> ---- Content & Policy Scan by M+ Guardian ----
> Millions of safe & clean messages delivered daily
>
>
>
>
> ---AV & Spam Filtering by M+Guardian - Risk Free Email (TM)---
>
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
>
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
>
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
>
>
>
> NOTICE: Florida has a broad public records law. Most written communications
> to or from this entity are public records that will be disclosed to the
> public and the media upon request. E-mail communications may be subject to
> public disclosure.
>
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> NOTICE: Florida has a broad public records law. Most written communications 
> to or from this entity are public records that will be disclosed to the 
> public and the media upon request. E-mail communications may be subject to 
> public disclosure.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> NOTICE: Florida has a broad public records law. Most written communications 
> to or from this entity are public records that will be disclosed to the 
> public and the media upon request. E-mail communications may be subject to 
> public disclosure.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> NOTICE: Florida has a broad public records law. Most written communications 
> to or from this entity are public records that will be disclosed to the 
> public and the media upon request. E-mail communications may be subject to 
> public disclosure.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to