-----Original Message----- From: Ben Scott [mailto:[email protected]] Subject: Re: Low end reliable workstations
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Brian Desmond <[email protected]> wrote: >>>... including 90% of Microsoft's stuff, falls into the category of >>>"poorly-written". >> >> I have no idea what your benchmark is for commercial software testing/design >> given that statement... > > I have no idea what your point is, given that statement. The point is, you have no metric to base your statement on (either the 90% claim, nor the "poorly written" claim). It seems to be something you just plucked out of the air. > If you think Microsoft stuff is the best thing ever, fine. Good for you. I think you're engaging in a logical fallacy here. Just because Brian pointed out the weakness in your statement doesn't mean that he believes in the polar opposite. Now, software has bugs. But I'm sure we could find just as many spelling and grammatical mistakes in the average post to the list. Does that mean that just about every here (90%) has a poor command of the English language? Cheers Ken ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
