I dunno, that whole section about placement of FSMO roles.....

2010/4/21 Andrew Levicki <[email protected]>

> Where does it say that?
>
> 2010/4/21 Christopher Bodnar <[email protected]>
>
> Sorry but I have to disagree with you. I believe the recommendation of the
>> article is to divide the FSMO roles, giving guidance on how to do that.
>>
>>
>> Chris Bodnar, MCSE
>> Systems Engineer
>> Distributed Systems Service Delivery - Intel Services
>> Guardian Life Insurance Company of America
>> Email: [email protected]
>> Phone: 610-807-6459
>> Fax: 610-807-6003
>>
>>
>>
>> From:        Andrew Levicki <[email protected]>
>> To:        "NT System Admin Issues" <
>> [email protected]>
>> Date:        04/21/2010 10:06 AM
>> Subject:        Re: Domain controllers, what is supposed to happen.
>> ------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> Have a read of this and see what you think:
>> *http://support.microsoft.com/kb/223346*<http://support.microsoft.com/kb/223346>
>>
>> <http://support.microsoft.com/kb/223346>You're not the first person I've
>> encountered who thinks that about FSMO roles but I think Microsoft are
>> pretty clear on this one.
>>
>> I'd probably rip WINS out if it's not needed, by the way.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Andrew
>>
>> 2010/4/21 Reimer, Mark <*[email protected]*<[email protected]>
>> >
>> I thought I read somewhere (this is years ago), that FSMO roles should be
>> split, with some qualifications (some FSMO roles had to be connected
>> together on the same machine).
>>
>>
>>
>> DHCP is from server2 (yes, one of the DC’s).
>>
>>
>>
>> WINS. Not sure if there is a real requirement.
>>
>>
>>
>> Not sure if a reboot was done. I’ll check with the user today.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks for the advice/comments.
>>
>>
>>
>> Mark
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Andrew Levicki [mailto:*[email protected]*<[email protected]>]
>> *
>> Sent:* Wednesday, April 21, 2010 7:40 AM
>>
>> *
>> To:* NT System Admin Issues*
>> Subject:* Re: Domain controllers, what is supposed to happen.
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>>
>>
>> I have a couple of questions if you don't mind. Firstly why have you split
>> the FSMO roles out on to two different domain controllers? It's not that
>> it's wrong or anything, it's just simpler (and Microsoft's recommendation)
>> to keep them all on one domain controller unless there is a specific need to
>> do otherwise.
>>
>>
>>
>> Secondly, which server(s) is/are your DHCP server? Another server right?
>> Not one of the domain controllers?
>>
>>
>>
>> Thirdly, what is your requirement for WINS, out of interest?
>>
>>
>>
>> To answer your questions, yes the DNS/WINS services on the remaining
>> domain controller should have fulfilled client requests, so I would
>> certainly look into why that didn't happen. Did anyone try rebooting their
>> PCs, as that may have helped?
>>
>>
>>
>> If you had been unable to get Server1 running again then yes you would
>> have had to seize the domain-wide FSMO roles (RIP) from Server1 on to
>> Server2 and modify your DNS/WINS. But don't try and bring Server1 back up at
>> this point ("Then work on getting Server1 running again, or replacing it."),
>> you must rebuild or replace it.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>
>>
>> Andrew
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 21 April 2010 22:14, Reimer, Mark 
>> <*[email protected]*<[email protected]>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Sorry, long email.
>>
>>
>>
>> Windows 2003 Native Domain, two domain controllers, server1 and server2.
>> Workstations are primarily XP, some Windows 7. Other servers (file server,
>> email etc) are all Windows 2003. We have about 150 workstations.
>>
>>
>>
>> We have AD DNS, and WINS. Server1 has FSMO roles Infrastructure Master,
>> PDC Emulator, RID Master. Server2 has FSMO roles Domain Naming Master,
>> Schema Master. Both are GC’s.
>>
>>
>>
>> In the DHCP settings workstations get both server’s IP’s as DNS. Server2
>> is listed first, then server1. Primary WINS server is server1, secondary is
>> Server2.
>>
>>
>>
>> Last night Server1 went down. It was off hours, but I got a call from some
>> late night worker (using XP), saying they couldn’t do anything. Couldn’t
>> reach any of the servers, or internet. I was able to get the server going
>> again (bad memory chip, so I just took it out).
>>
>>
>>
>> I thought that if one server went down, the DNS/WINS look up would go to
>> the other server. But it might be slower (note, I didn’t try any of this,
>> just going on what the user said). Comments?
>>
>>
>>
>> If I didn’t get Server1 running again, what should I have done? I assume I
>> should do the following.
>>
>>
>>
>> 1.       Seize the FSMO roles from server1, and put them on server2.
>>
>> 2.       Change DHCP so Primary WINS server is server2. Maybe even take
>> out Server1 as DNS/WINS possibilities.
>>
>>
>>
>> Then work on getting Server1 running again, or replacing it.
>>
>>
>>
>> Did I miss anything?
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks for any help and insight you can give.
>>
>>
>>
>> Mark
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Andrew Levicki
>> ルビッキー アンドルュー
>> Microsoft Certified Technology Specialist on Windows 7
>> MCITP Enterprise Administrator on Windows Server 2008
>> MCITP Enterprise Messaging Administrator on Exchange Server 2007
>> Microsoft Certified Systems Engineer (MCSE) on Windows Server 2003
>> Cisco Certified Network Associate (CCNA)
>> ITILv3
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Andrew Levicki
>> ルビッキー アンドルュー
>> Microsoft Certified Technology Specialist on Windows 7
>> MCITP Enterprise Administrator on Windows Server 2008
>> MCITP Enterprise Messaging Administrator on Exchange Server 2007
>> Microsoft Certified Systems Engineer (MCSE) on Windows Server 2003
>> Cisco Certified Network Associate (CCNA)
>> ITILv3
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------- This message, and any
>> attachments to it, may contain information that is privileged, confidential,
>> and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this
>> message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that any use,
>> dissemination, distribution, copying, or communication of this message is
>> strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please
>> notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete the message and
>> any attachments. Thank you.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Kind regards,
>
> Andrew Levicki
> ルビッキー アンドルュー
> Microsoft Certified Technology Specialist on Windows 7
> MCITP Enterprise Administrator on Windows Server 2008
> MCITP Enterprise Messaging Administrator on Exchange Server 2007
> Microsoft Certified Systems Engineer (MCSE) on Windows Server 2003
> Cisco Certified Network Associate (CCNA)
> ITILv3
>
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
Sherry Abercrombie

"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
Arthur C. Clarke

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to