She sounds like a redhead to me ;)

On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Pete Howard <[email protected]> wrote:

> Who is this mythic cooper top ?
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* andy <[email protected]>
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues <[email protected]>
> *Sent:* Fri, April 23, 2010 4:15:39 PM
> *Subject:* Re: Malwarebytes: What is the difference...
>
>
> but ok, what are the battery of tests?
> What was done to nuke the virus's?  viri?
>
> virus == worm/trojan/pest/virus/unwanted crap/ on your computer
>
>
>
> At 03:47 PM 4/23/2010, you wrote:
>
> I think she is copper top
>
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr 
> <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>  Nah? So now we dont name people that we have had good support/contact
> with?  OK, I guess I missed the memo.
>
> --
> ME2
>
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 12:13 PM, <[email protected] > wrote:
>
> Nah...
>
> There are a few Sunbelt folks who read this forum.  We'll let them decide
> whether or not to identify her.
>
> Actually, she went by "Coppertop" as she started off as a consultant
> Sunbelt Support would bring in to deal with stubborn root kits.  I believe
> they have now hired her full time.
> --
> RMc
>
> Micheal Espinola Jr < [email protected]> wrote on 04/23/2010
> 02:08:47 PM:
>
>
> > Well, it would be nice to know who everyone is exalting.  We always
> > use names here to give props.
> >
> > --
> > ME2
> >
>
> > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 11:51 AM, justino garcia <
> [email protected]
> > > wrote:
> > May be, I don't want to be rude and give her name but it could be her.
> >
>
> > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr <
> > [email protected] > wrote:
> > Who is this "she" ?  Is this the same as the "Coppertop" reference?
> >
> > --
> > ME2
> >
> >
>
> > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 11:22 AM, justino garcia <
> [email protected]
> > > wrote:
> > Alex Great job in hiring her, she TOP notch.
> >
>
> > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 2:22 PM, justino garcia <[email protected]
> > > wrote:
> > yea Viper support helped us, in removing a rootkit on our exchange
> > box, She was top of the line, and new what should of been thier and
> > what should not? She was awesome, instead of rebulding the box we
> > had the rootkit nuked.
> >
>
> > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 1:57 PM, <[email protected] > wrote:
> >
> > We were about to nuke those stations, then She called.  She had it
> > pretty much cleaned up within a half-hour (but she gave us a battery
> > of tests to run overnight just to make sure.)
> > --
> > RMc
> >
> > "John Aldrich" < [email protected]> wrote on 04/23/2010
> 12:52:01 PM:
> >
> >
> > > Heh… well, if it’s THAT bad where NONE of the tools I’ve tried get
> > > rid of it, I figure it’s time to “take off and nuke it from
> > > orbit…it’s the only way to be sure.” J (seems like I read that just
> > > a few minutes ago…hmm… J) Seriously, I don’t think it’s worth that
> > > much headache if you’ve tried Vipre, VipreRescue, MBAM and SpyBot and
> it’s *
> > > still* infested….
> >
> > >
> > > [image removed] [image removed]
> > >
> > > From: [email protected] [ 
> > > mailto:[email protected]<[email protected]>]
>
> > > Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 1:37 PM
> > > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > > Subject: RE: Malwarebytes: What is the difference...
> > >
> > >
> > > Well, we've had a few times when VIPRE, VIPRERESCUE, and MBytes all
> > > failed.  I don't know about the other companies have to offer when
> > > this happens, but Sunbelt got me in touch with The Coppertop...
> > >
> > > She seems to know the exact boot sequence of all Windows versions
> > > and what should load and when.  It's amazing how quickly she found
> > > how a root kit was being loaded (as well as how to whack it).
> > >
> > > This makes Sunbelt a pretty amazing company!
> > > --
> > > Richard D. McClary
> > > Systems Administrator, Information Technology Group
> > > ASPCA®
> > > 1717 S. Philo Rd, Ste 36
> > > Urbana, IL  61802
> > >
> > > [email protected]
> > >
> > > P: 217-337-9761
> > > C: 217-417-1182
> > > F: 217-337-9761
> > > www.aspca.org
> > >
> > > The information contained in this e-mail, and any attachments
> > > hereto, is from The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty
> > to Animals®
> > > (ASPCA®) and is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named
> > > herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential
> > > information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail,
> > > you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution,
> > > copying or use of the contents of this e-mail, and any attachments
> > > hereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in
> > > error, please immediately notify me by reply email and permanently
> > > delete the original and any copy of this e-mail and any printout
> thereof.
> > >
> > >
> > > "John Aldrich" < [email protected]> wrote on 04/23/2010
> > 11:43:55 AM:
> > >
> > > > Great! I didn’t really realize that, but I do know that no one
> > > > product takes care of everything, including (unfortunately) Vipre!
> > > > I’m VERY happy with Vipre, as it seems to be better at catching
> > > > stuff before it can get installed than AVG ever was (we used to use
> > > > AVG here) and it’s got a smaller “footprint” in memory! None of our
> > > > machines are “old and slow”…well, most aren’t. J That being said,
> > > > it’s nice to know we don’t have to put 3 Gigs of memory in a machine
> > > > just to satisfy our Anti-Malware product! J
> > > >
> > > > [image removed] [image removed]
> > > >
> > > > From: Stu Sjouwerman [ 
> > > > mailto:[email protected]<[email protected]>]
>
> > > > Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 12:34 PM
> > > > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > > > Subject: RE: Malwarebytes: What is the difference...
> > > >
> > > > I think I can add something here. FAFAIK, Malwarebytes is something
> > > > of a ‘point’
> > > > solution in the sense that they specialize in removing trojans, and
> > > > only trojans,
> > > > but they are very good at that.  They are not a generalized
> > malware scanner
> > > > that does AV, rootkits, and all other malware like VIPRE.
> > > >
> > > > Warm regards,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Stu Sjouwerman
> > > > Co-Founder, Publisher, Sunbelt Media
> > > > P: +1-727-562-0101 ext 218
> > > > F: +1-727-562-5199
> > > > [email protected]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > From: Jay Dale [ mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>]
> > > > Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 12:01 PM
> > > > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > > > Subject: RE: Malwarebytes: What is the difference...
> > > >
> > > > MalwareBytes is predominantly a Spyware/malware scanner.  It’s used
> > > > primarily for removal if you’re already infected.  I think the pay
> > > > option has an active scanner with it, but since most people have
> > > > active scanners it’s not used as often.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Jay Dale
> > > > I.T. Manager, 3GiG
> > > > Mobile: 713.299.2541
> > > > Email: [email protected]
> > > >
> > > > Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, including any attached files,
> > > > may contain confidential and/or privileged information for the sole
> > > > use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended
> > > > recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination or
> > > > copying of this e-mail and attachments, if any, or the information
> > > > contained herein, is strictly prohibited. If you are not the
> > > > intended recipient (or authorized to receive information for the
> > > > intended recipient), please contact the sender by reply e-mail and
> > > > delete all copies of this message.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > From: David Lum [ mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>]
> > > > Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 10:59 AM
> > > > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > > > Subject: Malwarebytes: What is the difference...
> > > >
> > > > Between Malwarebytes and your usual AV scanner? Does it make sense
> > > > to have a desktop AV  -AND- Malwarebytes?
> > > > David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER
> > > > NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION
> > > > (Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> > --
> > Justin
> > IT-TECH
> >
> >
>
> > --
> > Justin
> > IT-TECH
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> > --
> > Justin
> > IT-TECH
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Justin
> IT-TECH
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --------Andy-Ofalt---863-3449------405-Ag-Admin-Bldg------for more
> information go  to * 
> http://ict.cas.psu.edu/Contacts.html*<http://ict.cas.psu.edu/Contacts.html%A0>
> **  <http://ict.cas.psu.edu/Contacts.html%A0> ---------- My little blurb
> to eat up bandwidth and make your mail box even larger
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  The real problem is that IP, a connectionless protocol, was never
> developed to be the universal protocol. ATM was developed to serve that
> purpose and failed.
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
Sherry Abercrombie

"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
Arthur C. Clarke

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to