%dayjob% does sub-domain as well, one of my clients I have .local (they are 
ci.cornelius.or.us on the outside anyhow), and another client is same 
inside/outside (I inherited this setup).

Dave

-----Original Message-----
From: Jacob [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 7:42 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Current AD domain naming best practices

What we use... sub-domain. Have had no issues for years.

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 7:31 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Current AD domain naming best practices

This will _KILL_ you if you ever need to deploy ADFS.

Best practice is to use a sub-domain (i.e., ad.example.com) of your external
domain.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com


-----Original Message-----
From: John Aldrich [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 10:30 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Current AD domain naming best practices

My understanding is the same as your Novell admin's: keep the two separate,
i.e. businessname.com for external and businessname.local for internal.




-----Original Message-----
From: Joseph Heaton [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 10:22 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Current AD domain naming best practices

We are currently in the beginning phases of migrating from Novell
e-Directory, to AD.  We are having discussions to decide on a new internal
domain name.  I know that years ago, it was best practice to have a
different internal domain name from your external domain name, which is what
the Novell guy is holding onto, like a pitbull to a mailman's leg.  Is that
still true today?  We are on private IPs internally, so external forces
can't route to the inside anyway, so my thinking, and the other Windows
admins, is that having the same FQDN internally would be ok.

TIA,

Joe


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~
<http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~
<http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to