Andrew, So you don't recommend the subdomain? Also, if you could expand on your answer, it'd be great, as I'm bringing all ideas to a meeting this afternoon, with pros/cons behind each option.
>>> "Andrew S. Baker" <[email protected]> 4/28/2010 8:55 AM >>> Use two separate domain names, even if you register the internal one. You can avoid all manner of political complexity this way plus support all your external services as well. -ASB: http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker Sent from my Motorola Droid On Apr 28, 2010 10:23 AM, "Joseph Heaton" <[email protected]> wrote: We are currently in the beginning phases of migrating from Novell e-Directory, to AD. We are having discussions to decide on a new internal domain name. I know that years ago, it was best practice to have a different internal domain name from your external domain name, which is what the Novell guy is saying. Is that still true today? We are on private IPs internally, so external forces can't route to the inside anyway, so my thinking, and the other Windows admins, is that having the same FQDN internally would be ok. TIA, Joe ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
