Just as IPS products are maturing to the point that signatures are only a small part of the arsenal, so AV will have to mature. The players that de-emphasize signatures for blacklisting purposes will flourish.
See: http://bit.ly/bv8dpO -ASB: http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker Sent from my Motorola Droid On May 11, 2010 9:15 AM, "Ziots, Edward" <[email protected]> wrote: You can also read the blurb on San's ISC page also, some vendors say its important, and of course Mcafee discredits it, not that suprises me. But it is an attack vector to consider. Controling the execution of code on your system is the difference between keeping your systems clean and getting 0wned. Whether you look at HIPS/Whitelisting/Blacklisting, otherwise, you are going to have to have more on your systems than just AV to combat todays threat landscape. Sincerely, EZ Edward Ziots CISSP,MCSA,MCP+I,Security +,Network +,CCA Network Engineer Lifespan Organization 401-639-3505 [email protected] -----Original Message----- From: Ben Scott [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 20... Subject: Re: Life just keeps getting better.... On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 12:40 AM, Kurt Buff <kurt.b... ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
