Yeah, I generally try not to install apps on the C: drive on servers. It
definitely makes more sense to install them on a separate partition. Now,
that being said, I wasn't the one who initially set up the servers (although
I was here when it happened.) We had a consulting vendor come in to set them
up as well as set up the AD as this is the first AD in the company and I had
never stood one up from scratch before and wanted it as easy as possible. J
They were the ones who installed the Server OS and set up the directory tree
while I watched. I'm reasonably certain I could do it myself in the future.

 

John-AldrichTile-Tools

 

From: Bob Hartung [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 8:54 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: partition size for 2008 (was: Low disk space)

 

Here's my take on the server C: drive. I want it to be as small as possible
so that in the event of catastrophe it's relatively quick to restore. 20 GB
of space should be more than adequate for the typical Win2K3 server as long
as you make a point of not installing apps on it. While there are apps that
are hard-coded to install on the C: drive, the vast majority give you the
option to change the default install location.

Beyond that, the suggestions by others to change the location of the
pagefile and temp directories are helpful but I find apps, particularly
those that also install SQL Express are the ones that cause the most space
issues. If there's no benefit in installing something to the C: drive,
don't.


----------------------

Bob Hartung
Wisco Industries, Inc.
736 Janesville St.
Oregon, WI 53575
Tel: (608) 835-3106 x215
Fax: (608) 835-7399
e-mail: bhartung(at)wiscoind.com

  _____  

From: [email protected]
To: NT System Admin Issues [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 05:41:43 -0500
Subject: Re: partition size for 2008 (was: Low disk space)

I agree with Ken on this one and have painfully experienced that whole "20
GB is enough for C:" scenario. I'm building all my 2008 servers with a
minimum of 100 GB for the OS partition.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ken Schaefer" <[email protected]>
To: "NT System Admin Issues" <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 7, 2010 11:02:31 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: RE: partition size for 2008 (was: Low disk space)

People said the same thing about 20GB C: partitions under Win2k3. And then
after 5-6 years, after installing apps, installing updates, various log
files, you end up in a situation where you start to run out of space.

I've already got DCs here built with 36GB C: partitions with Win2k8 that are
running out of space. Pagefile, expanded event logs, expanding NTDS, various
applications etc, just start to consume space. In a large enterprise, we
don't have the luxury of someone spending 24 hours to look at files and work
out what to delete. So, it's just better to provision more space in the
first place. Given that storage is usually < $1/GB, I don't consider paying
an extra $100 or so per DC to have an extra few years of piece-of-mind. I
don't know what John earns, but given the amount of time that's been spent
on the issue, I'd be questioning the ROI on this endeavour.

Cheers
Ken

-----Original Message-----
From: Ben Scott [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, 8 June 2010 10:41 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: C: partition size for 2008 (was: Low disk space)

On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 10:24 PM, Ken Schaefer <[email protected]> wrote:
> Even 20GB is too small. Aim for 40-50GB. If you are even thinking of 
> upgrading to Win2k8 then 72GB would be my minimum

  72 GB for the C: partition....

  I haven't really played with 2008 yet.  What in %DEITY%'s name is on there
that needs that much space?  :)

  I was thinking of going with 2008 R2 Enterprise, in a host plus four VM
config, for our next server upgrade cycle.  Going with your recommendation,
I can expect to have to dedicate 360 gigabytes of disk just to C:
partitions.

  I think we have around 300 GB of corporate data total, not including
Exchange!  :-)

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

 

 

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

<<image001.jpg>>

<<image002.jpg>>

Reply via email to