James - 
I assume C: is a RAID of some sort?
What did you use to increase the C: partition?
 
 
 

________________________________

From: James Rankin [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 9:25 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: partition size for 2008 (was: Low disk space)


We had 20GB originally for our Windows 2003 Citrix servers and we had to
shunt them all to 28GB recently. Not that they were actually running out
of space - just they were down to about 2GB and this was making them all
alert through Ops Manager. However we do have some nasty apps that like
to write to the c: drive, some idiot admins with enormous profiles, lots
of old hotfix uninstallers and the like.



On 8 June 2010 13:53, Bob Hartung <[email protected]> wrote:


        Here's my take on the server C: drive. I want it to be as small
as possible so that in the event of catastrophe it's relatively quick to
restore. 20 GB of space should be more than adequate for the typical
Win2K3 server as long as you make a point of not installing apps on it.
While there are apps that are hard-coded to install on the C: drive, the
vast majority give you the option to change the default install
location.
        
        Beyond that, the suggestions by others to change the location of
the pagefile and temp directories are helpful but I find apps,
particularly those that also install SQL Express are the ones that cause
the most space issues. If there's no benefit in installing something to
the C: drive, don't.
        

        ----------------------
        
        Bob Hartung
        Wisco Industries, Inc.
        736 Janesville St.
        Oregon, WI 53575
        Tel: (608) 835-3106 x215
        Fax: (608) 835-7399
        e-mail: bhartung(at)wiscoind.com
        

________________________________

                From: [email protected]
                To: NT System Admin Issues
[mailto:[email protected]]
                Sent: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 05:41:43 -0500
                Subject: Re: partition size for 2008 (was: Low disk
space)
                
                
                I agree with Ken on this one and have painfully
experienced that whole "20 GB is enough for C:" scenario. I'm building
all my 2008 servers with a minimum of 100 GB for the OS partition.
                ----- Original Message -----
                From: "Ken Schaefer" <[email protected]>
                To: "NT System Admin Issues"
<[email protected]>
                Sent: Monday, June 7, 2010 11:02:31 PM GMT -05:00
US/Canada Eastern
                
                Subject: RE: partition size for 2008 (was: Low disk
space)
                
                People said the same thing about 20GB C: partitions
under Win2k3. And then after 5-6 years, after installing apps,
installing updates, various log files, you end up in a situation where
you start to run out of space.
                
                I've already got DCs here built with 36GB C: partitions
with Win2k8 that are running out of space. Pagefile, expanded event
logs, expanding NTDS, various applications etc, just start to consume
space. In a large enterprise, we don't have the luxury of someone
spending 24 hours to look at files and work out what to delete. So, it's
just better to provision more space in the first place. Given that
storage is usually < $1/GB, I don't consider paying an extra $100 or so
per DC to have an extra few years of piece-of-mind. I don't know what
John earns, but given the amount of time that's been spent on the issue,
I'd be questioning the ROI on this endeavour.
                
                Cheers
                Ken
                
                -----Original Message-----
                From: Ben Scott [mailto:[email protected]] 
                Sent: Tuesday, 8 June 2010 10:41 AM
                To: NT System Admin Issues
                Subject: C: partition size for 2008 (was: Low disk
space)
                
                On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 10:24 PM, Ken Schaefer
<[email protected]> wrote:
                > Even 20GB is too small. Aim for 40-50GB. If you are
even thinking of 
                > upgrading to Win2k8 then 72GB would be my minimum
                
                  72 GB for the C: partition....
                
                  I haven't really played with 2008 yet.  What in
%DEITY%'s name is on there that needs that much space?  :)
                
                  I was thinking of going with 2008 R2 Enterprise, in a
host plus four VM config, for our next server upgrade cycle.  Going with
your recommendation, I can expect to have to dedicate 360 gigabytes of
disk just to C: partitions.
                
                  I think we have around 300 GB of corporate data total,
not including Exchange!  :-)
                
                
                ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a
resource hog! ~
                ~
<http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
                
                

                 

                

                 

                

         

        

         




-- 
"On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put
into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am
not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could
provoke such a question."



 

 


.
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to