I don't think there would have been ANY complaints if having no background would have been an option from the beginning. The white background 'fix' killed all the colors of the logo and some of the other text.
From: MarvinC [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 3:12 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Google and stupid background pictures Always odd to hear the very people who should be pushing for change complain when they're presented. If no one thought to deploy or implement new strategies things would stay the same. Hint this stale white background. Other than the complacent minded, who wants that? Why not add some variety and creativity to the search process? The beauty is having the ability to change the background to one of your liking. The kewl thing is that 10 - 16 year old kids who use Google more than Bing for searches are excited by the changes. So I hope Google keeps this feature and continue to build on it. The rest of us "old cranky" techheads should chill out. On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: LOL! -- ME2 On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Ben Scott <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: The last part might as well read, "After getting complaints from approximately the entire planet, we realized we had screwed the pooch big time". ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
