Sort of OT, but related...

FWIW...healthcare data retention... IANAL, however...

"American Health Information Management Association (AHIMA) recommends that 
health organizations keep adult patient records 10 years beyond the most recent 
encounter, pediatric records up to the age of majority plus the statute of 
limitations."

http://library.ahima.org/xpedio/groups/public/documents/ahima/bok1_012545.hcsp?dDocName=bok1_012545

http://www.magmutual.com/risk/FAQ-answer1.html#NC

In my state (North Carolina) we apparently do not have a statute of limitations 
on medical office record retention, however the recommendation is to keep 
pediatric records until a patient reaches the age of 30...

Care to try and read a tape 30 years from now? (or anything else for that 
matter...)

Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE
Technology Coordinator
Eagle Physicians & Associates, PA
[email protected]<BLOCKED::mailto:%[email protected]>
www.eaglemds.com<BLOCKED::http://www.eaglemds.com/>

________________________________
From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 11:05 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Tape vs. external drive reliability?

Duration is also an important variable to consider.  Some retention policies 
are for a minimum of 7 years, for tax and other financial auditing, and 
potentially the same for HR and healthcare data ...

With only needing a 24 month recall window, I'd lean towards tapes as long as I 
had the capacity for my backup window.  I still prefer 
online---nearline----offline

Erik Goldoff
IT  Consultant
Systems, Networks, & Security
'  Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! '
From: Eric Brouwer [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 10:58 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Tape vs. external drive reliability?

Very good point.  In my world, long term storage is 12-24 months.  After that, 
the projects we work on are totally out of date, and replaced by newer 
campaigns.

On Jul 28, 2010, at 10:56 AM, Erik Goldoff wrote:

One thing to keep in mind for 'long term' archival is tape format and drive 
availability.
On older tapes I'd had problems reading from a newer but 'downward read-only' 
compatible drive, as head alignment can become an issue.
With removable hard drives, the heads ( and their alignment) go with the 
platters.

Not saying which is safer, I'm not qualified to state a fact there.  But I am 
presenting an opinion to think about a bit more.

Erik Goldoff
IT  Consultant
Systems, Networks, & Security
'  Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! '
From: Eric Brouwer [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 10:24 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Tape vs. external drive reliability?

*sorry for the hijack*

You bring up an interesting point with the failure rate issue.  Are there any 
good studies on what is more reliable?  Tape, external drives, etc?

My current weekly backup is around 2TB as well, and I use an LTO library with 6 
slots.  3 tapes covers my weekly full, and nightly differentials.  So far, so 
good.  (Knock on wood...)

What is safer for long term archival purposes?  Tape or hard drive?

On Jul 28, 2010, at 10:13 AM, Sam Cayze wrote:







Eric Brouwer
IT Manager
www.forestpost.com<http://www.forestpost.com>
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
248.855.4333












________________________________
Any medical information contained in this electronic message is CONFIDENTIAL 
and privileged. It is unlawful for unauthorized persons to view, copy, 
disclose, or disseminate CONFIDENTIAL information. This electronic message may 
contain information that is confidential and/or legally privileged. It is 
intended only for the use of the individual(s) and/or entity named as 
recipients in the message. If you are not an intended recipient of this 
message, please notify the sender immediately and delete this material from 
your computer. Do not deliver, distribute or copy this message, and do not 
disclose its contents or take any action in reliance on the information that it 
contains.


Any medical information contained in this electronic message is CONFIDENTIAL 
and privileged. It is unlawful for unauthorized persons to view, copy, 
disclose, or disseminate CONFIDENTIAL information. This electronic message may 
contain information that is confidential and/or legally privileged. It is 
intended only for the use of the individual(s) and/or entity named as 
recipients in the message. If you are not an intended recipient of this 
message, please notify the sender immediately and delete this material from 
your computer. Do not deliver, distribute or copy this message, and do not 
disclose its contents or take any action in reliance on the information that it 
contains.



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to