It's also so much easier to just tell the auditors "Oh, data retention?
Yeah, we send our tapes to Iron Mountain (or whatever flavor vendor)".

 

Don Guyer

Systems Engineer - Information Services

Prudential, Fox & Roach/Trident Group

431 W. Lancaster Avenue

Devon, PA 19333

Direct: (610) 993-3299

Fax: (610) 650-5306

[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 

 

From: Raper, Jonathan - Eagle [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 2:19 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Tape vs. external drive reliability?

 

Sort of OT, but related...

 

FWIW...healthcare data retention... IANAL, however...

 

"American Health Information Management Association (AHIMA) recommends
that health organizations keep adult patient records 10 years beyond the
most recent encounter, pediatric records up to the age of majority plus
the statute of limitations."

 

http://library.ahima.org/xpedio/groups/public/documents/ahima/bok1_01254
5.hcsp?dDocName=bok1_012545

 

http://www.magmutual.com/risk/FAQ-answer1.html#NC

 

In my state (North Carolina) we apparently do not have a statute of
limitations on medical office record retention, however the
recommendation is to keep pediatric records until a patient reaches the
age of 30...

 

Care to try and read a tape 30 years from now? (or anything else for
that matter...)

Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE
Technology Coordinator
Eagle Physicians & Associates, PA
[email protected] <BLOCKED::mailto:%[email protected]> 
www.eaglemds.com <BLOCKED::http://www.eaglemds.com/>  

________________________________

From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 11:05 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Tape vs. external drive reliability?

 

Duration is also an important variable to consider.  Some retention
policies are for a minimum of 7 years, for tax and other financial
auditing, and potentially the same for HR and healthcare data ...

 

With only needing a 24 month recall window, I'd lean towards tapes as
long as I had the capacity for my backup window.  I still prefer
online---nearline----offline

 

Erik Goldoff

IT  Consultant

Systems, Networks, & Security 

'  Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! '

From: Eric Brouwer [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 10:58 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Tape vs. external drive reliability?

 

Very good point.  In my world, long term storage is 12-24 months.  After
that, the projects we work on are totally out of date, and replaced by
newer campaigns.

 

On Jul 28, 2010, at 10:56 AM, Erik Goldoff wrote:

 

One thing to keep in mind for 'long term' archival is tape format and
drive availability.

On older tapes I'd had problems reading from a newer but 'downward
read-only' compatible drive, as head alignment can become an issue.

With removable hard drives, the heads ( and their alignment) go with the
platters.

 

Not saying which is safer, I'm not qualified to state a fact there.  But
I am presenting an opinion to think about a bit more.

 

Erik Goldoff

IT  Consultant

Systems, Networks, & Security

'  Security is an ongoing process, not a one time event ! '

From: Eric Brouwer [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 10:24 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Tape vs. external drive reliability?

 

*sorry for the hijack*

 

You bring up an interesting point with the failure rate issue.  Are
there any good studies on what is more reliable?  Tape, external drives,
etc?

 

My current weekly backup is around 2TB as well, and I use an LTO library
with 6 slots.  3 tapes covers my weekly full, and nightly differentials.
So far, so good.  (Knock on wood...)

 

What is safer for long term archival purposes?  Tape or hard drive?

 

On Jul 28, 2010, at 10:13 AM, Sam Cayze wrote:

 

 

 

 

 


Eric Brouwer

IT Manager

www.forestpost.com

[email protected]

248.855.4333

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

________________________________

Any medical information contained in this electronic message is
CONFIDENTIAL and privileged. It is unlawful for unauthorized persons to
view, copy, disclose, or disseminate CONFIDENTIAL information. This
electronic message may contain information that is confidential and/or
legally privileged. It is intended only for the use of the individual(s)
and/or entity named as recipients in the message. If you are not an
intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender immediately
and delete this material from your computer. Do not deliver, distribute
or copy this message, and do not disclose its contents or take any
action in reliance on the information that it contains.



Any medical information contained in this electronic message is
CONFIDENTIAL and privileged. It is unlawful for unauthorized persons to
view, copy, disclose, or disseminate CONFIDENTIAL information. This
electronic message may contain information that is confidential and/or
legally privileged. It is intended only for the use of the individual(s)
and/or entity named as recipients in the message. If you are not an
intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender immediately
and delete this material from your computer. Do not deliver, distribute
or copy this message, and do not disclose its contents or take any
action in reliance on the information that it contains.

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to