+1 for Fortinet
+10 for appropriate protection and restriction without detailed monitoring. *ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) <http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker> *Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...* * * On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Jeff Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > We have fortinet firewalls with a fortianalyzer that I believe is capable > of all that, but I am happy to say I am too damn busy to configure all that > logging, let alone monitor anyone on that level. > > > On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Paul Everett < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> I am looking to replace our WatchGuard Firebox 700. >> >> Will some of the newer firewalls give me user level control. I’d like to >> be able to add users to different groups and to see what each user is doing >> on the Internet. Not just what protocol/port they are using, but actual >> website they are visiting. I’d also like to send them messages and be able >> to disconnect them. Icing would be able to see how much bandwidth each is >> using. >> >> I’d like to stay with WatchGuard, but am open to other suggestions. >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Paul >> >> >> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to [email protected] with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
