+1 Fortinet. Devices are robust and the subscriptions costs are reasonable.
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Andrew S. Baker <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 for Fortinet > > > +10 for appropriate protection and restriction without detailed monitoring. > > > *ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) <http://xeesm.com/AndrewBaker> > > > *Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...* > * * > > > > > On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Jeff Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > >> We have fortinet firewalls with a fortianalyzer that I believe is capable >> of all that, but I am happy to say I am too damn busy to configure all that >> logging, let alone monitor anyone on that level. >> >> >> On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Paul Everett < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I am looking to replace our WatchGuard Firebox 700. >>> >>> Will some of the newer firewalls give me user level control. I’d like to >>> be able to add users to different groups and to see what each user is doing >>> on the Internet. Not just what protocol/port they are using, but actual >>> website they are visiting. I’d also like to send them messages and be able >>> to disconnect them. Icing would be able to see how much bandwidth each is >>> using. >>> >>> I’d like to stay with WatchGuard, but am open to other suggestions. >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Paul >>> >>> >>> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ > > > ~ > > --- > To manage subscriptions click here: > http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ > > > or send an email to [email protected] > with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to [email protected] with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
