IME, the Buffalo products didn't support NTFS permissions, and I had to manage shared permissions individually for the users. This proved unwieldy quite quickly. So we migrated other commonly needed data to the NAS and user information back to DAS with NTFS permissions. This was about 4 years ago, so things may have changed. Just thought I'd throw this out there before you get too far along...
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Don Kuhlman <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Jack/all. Thanks for the info. We are at AD functional level 2003. > I'm going to guess the secure authentication settings are on, so how or > where do I turn them off to see if it helps? > > Don > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* "Kramer, Jack" <[email protected]> > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Wed, December 22, 2010 8:41:53 AM > *Subject:* Re: Buffalo - was Re: Home RAID enclosure recommendations? > > What's your AD functional level? Also do you have (iirc) secure > authentication or whatever it's called turned on? (Default is on in 2003 and > newer functional levels) > > Sometimes the problem is that the often-SAMBA-based SMB/CIFS components on > these little things can't handle the newer password hashes sent from a > domain with that setting turned on so you have to disable it. You'll degrade > your theoretical security a bit but it's unlikely that an attacker will be > able to take advantage of any new vulnerability without first physically > penetrating your network, so it can be worth it. > > ---- > Jack Kramer > Computer Systems Specialist > University Relations, Michigan State University > w: 517-884-1231 / c: 248-635-4955 > > From: Don Kuhlman <[email protected]> > Reply-To: NT System Admin Issues <[email protected]> > Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 09:37:54 -0500 > To: NT System Admin Issues <[email protected]> > Subject: Buffalo - was Re: Home RAID enclosure recommendations? > > Sorry to jump this thread, but speaking of Buffalo NAS - does anyone > have any good information (besides the Buffalo doc and website) on how to > get an LS-QL Linkstation Quad to work in an Active Directory environment as > a shared target for users to connect to via their domain login? > > I set it up using their doc to put in the domain name (for the workgroup), > DC's IP address, DNS IP, made an open share on it that users are supposed to > be able to map to so they get added to the access list and still couldn't > connect to it. > > I searched their forums and knowledge base then called support and they > were less than helpful. The guy said that there's an issue with Windows > Server 2008 and it's the OS's fault(even though it doesn't work from an XP > workstation, 2000 server or 2008 server), then said that we have network > issues which is why we can't access the drive from the server or any other > client on the lan. > > This morning the thing isn't even pingable so I can't access it via the web > interface... > > Thanks > > Don K > > ------------------------------ > *From:* David Lum <[email protected]> > *To:* NT System Admin Issues <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Wed, December 22, 2010 8:17:15 AM > *Subject:* RE: Home RAID enclosure recommendations? > > I have Cavalry USB 2.0/eSATA RAID1 externals drive and being just > external SATA it's just as fast as an internal SATA drive. If eSATA is OK > just do a web search for "eSATA RAID1 external" > > > > I have Buffalo NAS at clients as just extra storage and both solutions work > well. > > > > Dave > > > > > > > > *From:* Jim Slattery > [mailto:[email protected]<[email protected]>] > > *Sent:* Wednesday, December 22, 2010 5:57 AM > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* OT: Home RAID enclosure recommendations? > > > > I recently started taking a lot of photos and videos, and I'm realizing > that my current storage solution at home isn't going to cut it very soon. > > Does anyone have a recommendation for a good price/performance RAID > enclosure (or populated solution) for home use? I'd like to have 3-4TB > available if possible. > > Thanks, and Happy Holidays! > > Jim > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > --- > To manage subscriptions click here: > http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ > or send an email to [email protected] > with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > --- > To manage subscriptions click here: > http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ > or send an email to [email protected] > with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > --- > To manage subscriptions click here: > http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ > or send an email to [email protected] > with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > --- > To manage subscriptions click here: > http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ > or send an email to [email protected] > with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > --- > To manage subscriptions click here: > http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ > or send an email to [email protected] > with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to [email protected] with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
