I have a lady friend who is a lesbian and she calls herself an MD, but it
means something different...  :P

On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 7:48 AM, Don Guyer <[email protected]> wrote:

>  I agree, but I was answering the “how” not the “why”.
>
>
>
> J
>
>
>
> Maybe he’s a “Microsoft Doctor”…
>
>
>
> Don Guyer
>
> Systems Engineer - Information Services
>
> Prudential, Fox & Roach/Trident Group
>
> 431 W. Lancaster Avenue
>
> Devon, PA 19333
>
> Direct: (610) 993-3299
>
> Fax: (610) 650-5306
>
> [email protected]
>
>
>
> *From:* Raper, Jonathan - Eagle [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 06, 2011 10:44 AM
>
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: OT question (was RE: AD and firewall ports)
>
>
>
> Would I be incorrect in assuming that the MCSE who used to work at a lumber
> yard now earns substantially more than when they were employed at said
> lumber yard?
>
>
>
> Having worked for a private practice healthcare organization for the last
> 12 years, and having performed a payroll conversion in this organization, I
> also happen to have been privy to some of the physician salaries during that
> time. While what I make is nothing to sneeze at, physicians make more – even
> first year non-shareholder general practice physicians right out of
> residency make more (here anyway) than I do. Let’s not even talk about
> specialists.
>
>
>
> While I know that money certainly isn’t everything, it is a motivating
> factor much of the time. Like I said, I’m just curious what would motivate
> someone who spent at least 8 years (and who knows how much $) on higher
> education and residency rotations to make the transition from the healthcare
> world to the IT world – after obtaining the credentials as an MD. Certainly
> there is nothing wrong with that in the least. I’m simply curious. Everyone
> has a story, and this one (to me at least) seems like it might be more
> interesting than average.
>
> Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE
>
> Technology Coordinator
> Eagle Physicians & Associates, PA
> *
> *[email protected]*
> *www.eaglemds.com
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* Don Guyer [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 06, 2011 10:29 AM
>
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: OT question (was RE: AD and firewall ports)
>
>
>
> Same way a guy who worked at a lumber yard for 5 years did.
>
>
>
> J
>
>
>
> Don Guyer
>
> Systems Engineer - Information Services
>
> Prudential, Fox & Roach/Trident Group
>
> 431 W. Lancaster Avenue
>
> Devon, PA 19333
>
> Direct: (610) 993-3299
>
> Fax: (610) 650-5306
>
> [email protected]
>
>
>
> *From:* Raper, Jonathan - Eagle [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 06, 2011 10:29 AM
>
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* OT question (was RE: AD and firewall ports)
>
>
>
> Ok, I’m curious. How does an MD end up becoming an MCSE?
>
>
>
> (serious question)
>
> Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE
> Technology Coordinator
> Eagle Physicians & Associates, PA*
> *[email protected]*
> *www.eaglemds.com
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* Thomas W Shinder MD [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 06, 2011 9:50 AM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: AD and firewall ports
>
>
>
> Firewall guys are somewhat unclear regarding the relationship of "ports"
> and their implication in a security context.
>
>
>
> Often the easiest way to get around these guys is to use IPsec between the
> DMZ host and any other host on the intranet. Then you only need to allow UDP
> port 500. That makes the firewall guy happy and allows all protocols through
> the IPsec tunnel.
>
>
>
> *From:* Brian Desmond [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 06, 2011 8:33 AM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: AD and firewall ports
>
>
>
> *IIRC that KB that describes restricting DCOM ports actually explicitly
> recommends 100…*
>
> * *
>
> *Thanks,*
>
> *Brian Desmond*
>
> *[email protected]*
>
> * *
>
> *c   – 312.731.3132*
>
> * *
>
> *From:* joseph palmieri [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 05, 2011 6:54 PM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* AD and firewall ports
>
>
>
>
>
> Need assistance with firewall ports and active directory our server admin
> submitted a change request to open over 1000 port to support AD. The change
> was denied and resubmitted requesting a minimum of 100 ports to support RPC
> communications to a member server within our DMZ. Our firewall engineers
> stated while monitoring the firewall only 20 ports were communicated over
> and 100 ports are not needed.
>
>
>
> Has anyone had experience with this issue and can provide some clarity…are
> the server admin looking for an easy way out by requesting all these ports?
>
>
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to [email protected]
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to [email protected]
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to [email protected]
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> Any medical information contained in this electronic message is
> CONFIDENTIAL and privileged. It is unlawful for unauthorized persons to
> view, copy, disclose, or disseminate CONFIDENTIAL information. This
> electronic message may contain information that is confidential and/or
> legally privileged. It is intended only for the use of the individual(s)
> and/or entity named as recipients in the message. If you are not an intended
> recipient of this message, please notify the sender immediately and delete
> this material from your computer. Do not deliver, distribute or copy this
> message, and do not disclose its contents or take any action in reliance on
> the information that it contains.
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to [email protected]
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to [email protected]
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to [email protected]
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to [email protected]
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Reply via email to