James, 

 

>From the following M$ Kbase

 

http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc768048.aspx

 

*       System : Processor Queue Length. Oddly enough, this processor
counter shows up under the System object, but not without good reason.
There is only 1 queue for tasks that need to go to the processor, even
if there is more than one CPU. Thus, counter provides a measure of the
instantaneous size of the queue for all processors at the moment that
the measurement was taken. The resulting value is a measure of how many
threads are in the Ready state waiting to be processed. When dealing
with queues, if the value exceeds 2 for a sustained period, you are
definitely having a problem with the resource in question.

So I would say that a constant value of 40 to 50 would be an issue.
Here are some guidelines that are utilized in our RAP ( rapid Assessment
Programs) for SQL from Microsoft Premier Engineers. 

System

Processor Queue Length

< 4 per CPU

For standard servers with long Quantums
<= 4 per CPU Excellent
< 8 per CPU Good
< 12 per CPU  Fair

 

So with your 16 CPU ( assuming a QUAD, Quad Core Server, the value you
are looking to be under is 64, which you are.  So this might defintely
be oks here.  

 

Z

 

 

Edward E. Ziots

CISSP, Network +, Security +

Network Engineer

Lifespan Organization

Email:[email protected]

Cell:401-639-3505

 

From: James Rankin [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 8:44 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Processor Queue Length counter

 

If I have a server with 16 CPUs, and I am measuring the Processor Queue
Length counter to check performance, do I need to divide the total queue
length by 16 to get a true indication of the level it is at, or is it
accurate? I am using Citrix EdgeSight 5.3 to measure this, if it makes
any difference. My Processor Queue Length is regularly up to 40 or 50.

TIA,



JRR

-- 
"On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put
into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am
not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could
provoke such a question."

IMPORTANT: This email is intended for the use of the individual
addressee(s) named above and may contain information that is
confidential, privileged or unsuitable for overly sensitive persons with
low self-esteem, no sense of humour or irrational religious beliefs. If
you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this email is not authorised (either explicitly or
implicitly) and constitutes an irritating social faux pas.

Unless the word absquatulation has been used in its correct context
somewhere other than in this warning, it does not have any legal or no
grammatical use and may be ignored. No animals were harmed in the
transmission of this email, although the kelpie next door is living on
borrowed time, let me tell you. Those of you with an overwhelming fear
of the unknown will be gratified to learn that there is no hidden
message revealed by reading this warning backwards, so just ignore that
Alert Notice from Microsoft.

However, by pouring a complete circle of salt around yourself and your
computer you can ensure that no harm befalls you and your pets. If you
have received this email in error, please add some nutmeg and egg
whites, whisk and place in a warm oven for 40 minutes.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Reply via email to