Capital 'S'?  I'm curious, but also somewhat afraid to know why.

On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Ziots, Edward <[email protected]> wrote:

>  It aint Mularkey, when people complain your systems are slow and you
> don’t have the tools/counters to show them they are full of Shite…
>
>
>
> BTW: Look at PAL from Codeplex it’s a good tool to run your Performance
> Logs through.
>
>
>
> Z
>
>
>
> Edward E. Ziots
>
> CISSP, Network +, Security +
>
> Network Engineer
>
> Lifespan Organization
>
> Email:[email protected] <email%[email protected]>
>
> Cell:401-639-3505
>
>
>
> *From:* James Rankin [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 03, 2011 9:08 AM
>
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: Processor Queue Length counter
>
>
>
> Nice one, thanks for that, I am slowly starting to get my head around this
> testing and baselining mularkey :-)
>
> On 3 February 2011 13:58, Ziots, Edward <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> James,
>
>
>
> From the following M$ Kbase
>
>
>
> http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc768048.aspx
>
>
>
>    - *System : Processor Queue Length. *Oddly enough, this processor
>    counter shows up under the System object, but not without good reason. 
> There
>    is only 1 queue for tasks that need to go to the processor, even if there 
> is
>    more than one CPU. Thus, counter provides a measure of the instantaneous
>    size of the queue for all processors at the moment that the measurement was
>    taken. The resulting value is a measure of how many threads are in the 
> Ready
>    state waiting to be processed. When dealing with queues, if the value
>    exceeds 2 for a sustained period, you are definitely having a problem with
>    the resource in question.
>
> So I would say that a constant value of 40 to 50 would be an issue.  Here
> are some guidelines that are utilized in our RAP ( rapid Assessment
> Programs) for SQL from Microsoft Premier Engineers.
>
> System
>
> Processor Queue Length
>
> < 4 per CPU
>
> For standard servers with long Quantums
> <= 4 per CPU Excellent
> < 8 per CPU Good
> < 12 per CPU  Fair
>
>
>
> So with your 16 CPU ( assuming a QUAD, Quad Core Server, the value you are
> looking to be under is 64, which you are.  So this might defintely be oks
> here.
>
>
>
> Z
>
>
>
>
>
> Edward E. Ziots
>
> CISSP, Network +, Security +
>
> Network Engineer
>
> Lifespan Organization
>
> Email:[email protected] <email%[email protected]>
>
> Cell:401-639-3505
>
>
>
> *From:* James Rankin [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 03, 2011 8:44 AM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Processor Queue Length counter
>
>
>
> If I have a server with 16 CPUs, and I am measuring the Processor Queue
> Length counter to check performance, do I need to divide the total queue
> length by 16 to get a true indication of the level it is at, or is it
> accurate? I am using Citrix EdgeSight 5.3 to measure this, if it makes any
> difference. My Processor Queue Length is regularly up to 40 or 50.
>
> TIA,
>
>
>
> JRR
>
> --
> "On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into
> the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able
> rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such
> a question."
>
> *IMPORTANT: This email is intended for the use of the individual
> addressee(s) named above and may contain information that is confidential,
> privileged or unsuitable for overly sensitive persons with low self-esteem,
> no sense of humour or irrational religious beliefs. If you are not the
> intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email
> is not authorised (either explicitly or implicitly) and constitutes an
> irritating social faux pas.
>
> Unless the word absquatulation has been used in its correct context
> somewhere other than in this warning, it does not have any legal or no
> grammatical use and may be ignored. No animals were harmed in the
> transmission of this email, although the kelpie next door is living on
> borrowed time, let me tell you. Those of you with an overwhelming fear of
> the unknown will be gratified to learn that there is no hidden message
> revealed by reading this warning backwards, so just ignore that Alert Notice
> from Microsoft.
>
> However, by pouring a complete circle of salt around yourself and your
> computer you can ensure that no harm befalls you and your pets. If you have
> received this email in error, please add some nutmeg and egg whites, whisk
> and place in a warm oven for 40 minutes.*
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to [email protected]
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to [email protected]
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>
>
>
>
> --
> "On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into
> the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able
> rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such
> a question."
>
> *IMPORTANT: This email is intended for the use of the individual
> addressee(s) named above and may contain information that is confidential,
> privileged or unsuitable for overly sensitive persons with low self-esteem,
> no sense of humour or irrational religious beliefs. If you are not the
> intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email
> is not authorised (either explicitly or implicitly) and constitutes an
> irritating social faux pas.
>
> Unless the word absquatulation has been used in its correct context
> somewhere other than in this warning, it does not have any legal or no
> grammatical use and may be ignored. No animals were harmed in the
> transmission of this email, although the kelpie next door is living on
> borrowed time, let me tell you. Those of you with an overwhelming fear of
> the unknown will be gratified to learn that there is no hidden message
> revealed by reading this warning backwards, so just ignore that Alert Notice
> from Microsoft.
>
> However, by pouring a complete circle of salt around yourself and your
> computer you can ensure that no harm befalls you and your pets. If you have
> received this email in error, please add some nutmeg and egg whites, whisk
> and place in a warm oven for 40 minutes.*
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to [email protected]
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to [email protected]
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Reply via email to