Correct, especially because this is an Active-Passive Cluster, only the
owning node, holds the default SQL Cluster Group. 

 

Z

 

Edward E. Ziots

CISSP, Network +, Security +

Network Engineer

Lifespan Organization

Email:[email protected]

Cell:401-639-3505

 

From: William Robbins [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 2:52 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Sounding board on issue we are seeing with a Windows 2003
Cluster with SQL 2005

 

Crap...would not affect both nodes at the same time.

 - WJR



On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 13:50, William Robbins <[email protected]>
wrote:

Not underestimating the power of the luser variable...but I would expect
that would affect both nodes at the same time.

 - WJR



On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 13:43, Jonathan Link <[email protected]>
wrote:

        Pure speculation, but the time frame to me screams:

        User runs a manual query that in their experience takes a long
time to process (they don't know why) so they set it to start as they
leave for the day, and then take action on the results the next day...

        
         

        On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Ziots, Edward
<[email protected]> wrote:

        I have a two node X64bit Windows 2003 SP2 enterprise edition
cluster running SQL 2005 Standard Edition 64bit. 

         

        What I am seeing is event ID's 1123, 1124 in the event logs on
each Cluster Node, and we are getting complaints of disconnects from the
database. 

         

        We are seeing it happen around 5:50-6:00pm each night.  ( shows
in the cluster log and we seen it via pings)

         

        1)      We have eliminated the backup of the server, which
happens at 3:30am in the morning ( via Legato)

        2)      I have gone through with Microsoft Support the entire KB
892422. Which covers these errors. 

        3)      I have switched out the cables to the public and the
private NIC's with no change in issues. 

        4)      RSS/TCP Chimney are disabled in the registry and on the
NIC's on each node. 

        5)      NIC Drivers are the latest from HP Site ( NC373i) and
EMC Powerpath software 5.3 SP1 for the SAN disk on each node. 

         

        Basically we are pinging the Owning Node server from our
workstations and we loose about 5-10 pings during this time, on both the
primary and the secondary nodes of the cluster. ( both are into the same
Cisco Switch 45xx)

         

        We also was pinging each of the servers from each other ( both
on the same switch/VLAN) and we also saw the ping loss at the same time.


         

        Only idea I had is to move the public NIC's to another switch to
eliminate the switch as the point of contention, or get new hardware and
migrate the databases off this cluster and decommission it. 

         

        I checked other cluster nodes connected to these switches (
32bit) and we don't see this problem. 

         

        Anything I might be missing or overlooked? Questions, or
bouncing some ideas off the wall is appreciated...

         

        Z

         

        Edward E. Ziots

        CISSP, Network +, Security +

        Network Engineer

        Lifespan Organization

        Email:[email protected] <mailto:email%[email protected]> 

        Cell:401-639-3505

         

        ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog!
~
        ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
        
        ---
        To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
        or send an email to [email protected]
        with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

         

        ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog!
~
        ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
        
        ---
        To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
        or send an email to [email protected]
        with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Reply via email to