Yeah, by and large, printing decisions are out of my hands.  Most of it is
handled by a contract with our service provider on MFPs.  It saves a lot of
headaches on my end, and we're very happy with the service we receive.

We have a printer for our accounting services group, because they write
checks, and well, it ruins their day when someone prints out on check
stock.  Labels and the few partners who need printers in their offices...
By and large, I've oversized printers where possible.

This was a case where I have a small physical area to put a printer, it was
wireless,  which was nice because it meant I didn't have to run a 50' patch
cable, blah, blah, blah and the only use was for labels...

If it's too good to be true...

On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Erik Goldoff <[email protected]> wrote:

> no argument there ... and I am also oppposed to users putting any kind of
> label sheets in the feed for a primary, high use network printer.  Seen too
> many fusing rollers gunked up from poor quality labels that came apart
> inside the printer.  So I'm all for using dedicated label printing lasers.
>
>  On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Bob Fronk <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>   I consider any printer that will sit on a user’s desk as disposable.
>> (Less any tiny manufactures warranty).  I am pretty anti-personal printer,
>> but sometimes there have been valid arguments to the contrary.  (Valid to
>> the person arguing for the printer anyway.).
>>
>>
>>
>> We have had decent luck with most of the Dell offerings.  I think they are
>> all still made by Lexmark.  Some of the high-end ones I purchased have been
>> spitting out 1000’s of pages a week for 3-4 years now without a hitch.
>>   Some of the less expensive ones have died in less than 12 months.
>>
>>
>>
>> BF
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Jonathan Link [mailto:[email protected]]
>> *Sent:* Thursday, February 24, 2011 11:14 AM
>>
>> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
>> *Subject:* Re: HP P1102
>>
>>
>>
>> But now, not so much, ya know what I mean?
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Jonathan Link <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> The purchase wasn't entirely my decision. :-/
>>
>> I had help...
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Erik Goldoff <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Just took a look at it online.
>>
>>
>>
>> 1)  I don't buy any laser printer that does not have an enclosed paper
>> tray
>>
>> 2)  This looks like one of those sub $100 printers where it's easier and
>> cheaper to buy another rather than a new toner cartridge ( a al my ex
>> Samsung CLP-500 color laser )
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Jonathan Link <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>  <PSA>
>>
>> Don't buy this printer.
>>
>>
>>
>> </PSA>
>>
>>   ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
>> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>>
>> ---
>> To manage subscriptions click here:
>> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
>> or send an email to [email protected]
>> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>>
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to [email protected]
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Reply via email to