How many companies view security as an expense rather than an asset?    Are 
Cloud providers immune to that thinking?

As to the source code comment; basic cost savings stuff.   It costs too much to 
run a data center 24/7.  An IT staff is costly.   Disaster Recovery is costly.  
 The Cloud can do all the for far less......

Thanks,
Mathew

From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2011 12:48 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Be Very Wary of "The Cloud"...

And yet financial institutions are heavy users of both traditional outsourcing 
(both on- and off-shore) and of cloud computing.

http://searchcloudcomputing.techtarget.com/news/1521554/Financial-institutions-test-cloud-computing-waters

The cloud is not an all or nothing venture.  There's plenty of computing that 
these types of organizations do that does not have PII associated with it.   
There are "cloud" options which also don't rely on public cloud, too.

These risks inherent with all sorts of technologies.  They merely have to be 
identified, assessed, and then mitigated or avoided as best fits the scenario 
at hand.

As for any source-code-in-the-cloud statements, I cannot comment without having 
the context in which they were made...





ASB (Professional Bio<http://about.me/Andrew.S.Baker/bio>)
Harnessing the Advantages of Technology for the SMB market...


On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Mathew Shember 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Financial institutions are heavily regulated and can't treat security measures 
as an expense.

I heard one Cloud person talking about who we don't need data centers, you can 
put your source code on the cloud.

Are people willing to trust the cloud with that?


Thanks,
Mathew

From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2011 11:57 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Be Very Wary of "The Cloud"...

>>I want to have total control over my programs and data and I won't in the 
>>Cloud! All my backups are done locally on hardware and by personnel located 
>>in MY location!



In many cases, this is a good business decision.   In some cases, however, 
doing so adds cost that is not commensurate with the value provided.  Knowing 
when this is true, is smart business.

This is why every organization does not process its own credit cards, or manage 
its own ecommerce, or attempt to staff its own local data centers 24x7...



ASB (Professional Bio<http://about.me/Andrew.S.Baker/bio>)
Harnessing the Advantages of Technology for the SMB market...

On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:42 PM, MMF 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
The Cloud will cause the loss of both onsite jobs and hardware. That's not what 
concerns me. It's the loss of control and security that concerns me. I want to 
have total control over my programs and data and I won't in the Cloud! All my 
backups are done locally on hardware and by personnel located in MY location!

M. Free




<The Cloud is just another name for outsoucing.
<If the cloud takes hold, datacenters will quick enough move to China/India and 
the IT profession in the US will be dead.
<A few cisco guys will be left over to keep the internet up, and that's about 
it.

<Fight the cloud!

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to [email protected]
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Reply via email to