I just use Creator as the interface, we do everything with CMake - if you just treat it as a regular project it will happily work with generic makefile builds vs having to jump through qmake/qtcreator project hoops.
cheers On 2012-04-06, at 11:11 AM, Steven Booth wrote: > Colin, > > I thought about QTCreator, but some of what I do is CUDA-enhanced node > development, and my experiences getting QTCreator and nvcc to play well > together has not been encouraging. I’ll have another look, though. Creator > certainly has an excellent interface, it’s true. > > Steve > > From: nuke-dev-boun...@support.thefoundry.co.uk > [mailto:nuke-dev-boun...@support.thefoundry.co.uk] On Behalf Of Colin > Doncaster > Sent: Friday, April 06, 2012 7:11 AM > To: Nuke plug-in development discussion > Subject: Re: [Nuke-dev] Recommended development environment for Linux > > I was a big Eclipse user - and still am for non-C++ development - but > QTCreator is way faster, I found Eclipse started to really bog down when > parsing larger projects etc. > > -- > Colin Doncaster > Peregrine Labs > http://peregrinelabs.com > > On 2012-04-06, at 3:27 AM, Nathan Rusch wrote: > > > I use the same setup (Eclipse for dev, manual Makefiles for building). > Wouldn’t change a thing. > > -Nathan > > > From: Steve3D > Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2012 9:27 AM > To: nuke-dev@support.thefoundry.co.uk > Subject: [Nuke-dev] Recommended development environment for Linux > > In an effort to expand my horizons, I've recently configured a Linux (Ubuntu > actually) development machine for plugin development. In doing so, I chose > Eclipse CDT as my IDE and of course g++ as the compiler. This all seems > reasonable, but i was wondering if this is the 'preferred' or 'normal' > development platform. > > Are there some Linux-based developers out there that might be willing to > share the tools they use for doing Nuke plugin development? > > _______________________________________________ > Nuke-dev mailing list > Nuke-dev@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-dev > _______________________________________________ > Nuke-dev mailing list > Nuke-dev@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-dev > > (CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this email may be > confidential and/or privileged. This email is intended to be reviewed by only > the individual or organization named above. If you are not the intended > recipient, or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are > hereby notified that any review, dissemination or copying of this email, or > the information contained herein is strictly prohibited. If you have received > this communication in error, please notify the sender by return email and > delete this email from your system. Thank You.) > > _______________________________________________ > Nuke-dev mailing list > Nuke-dev@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-dev
_______________________________________________ Nuke-dev mailing list Nuke-dev@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-dev
