Hi, Sorry but this is not a reply to your question but a feature request for it. I have been working with Katana recently as well as Nuke and it would be great to have something similar to Katana SuperTools. They function in the exact way you want and they are a really great advance on Gizmo's.
Hope someone else can give you an answer. Jack. On 26 May 2014 10:22, "Ben Dickson" <[email protected]> wrote: > Is it possible to subclass the Group node? I want a node which acts > exactly like a group, just with a different node class > > > Why? We have a node which might contain a bunch of Read nodes merged > together (and maybe, say, a camera). To a user it is practically a fancy > Read node, but is technically just a Group with a bunch of related > Python callbacks/buttons > > While this all works fine, it causes lots of special-case handling > regarding the Group node.. for example the knobChanged callbacks have to > be added with nodeClass="Group", then the callback has to check if > nuke.thisNode() has a specially named knob. > > Making the node a gizmo instead of a group would solve this, but this > loses the benefit of being a group (not rebuilding the internal nodes on > each load, easily persisting user modification to the internal nodes) > -- > ben dickson > 2D TD | [email protected] > rising sun pictures | www.rsp.com.au > _______________________________________________ > Nuke-dev mailing list > [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-dev >
_______________________________________________ Nuke-dev mailing list [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-dev
