>>> But in my opinion, Fusion's biggest hurdle is bad documentation and no user > forum such as this one here.<<
fusion actually has an excellent listserv. http://fusion.laffeycomputer.com/?l On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Ron Ganbar <[email protected]> wrote: > I always found it very odd that everything in Fusion is measured in > percentage rather than pixels. Am I the only one? > Plus the way Fusion handles premultiplication is difficult and annoying as > well. > But in my opinion, Fusion's biggest hurdle is bad documentation and no user > forum such as this one here. > > > Ron Ganbar > email: [email protected] > tel: +44 (0)7968 007 309 [UK] > +972 (0)54 255 9765 [Israel] > url: http://ronganbar.wordpress.com/ > > > On 13 April 2011 21:49, [email protected] <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Yes, I have used it (the linux port), it is completely awful. >> >> On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Ned Wilson <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Well it's great that Fusion does all that 3D acceleration. However, and >> > I >> > was on Fusion for years and went back and forth with the developers on >> > this >> > many, many times... it has issues with functionality that is integral to >> > compositing, such as 2D tracking and paint. >> > Granted I haven't used Fusion 6, so perhaps this has changed. >> > Plus, Fusion is coded using MFC, not a cross-platform tool kit like Qt. >> > They >> > have no intentions of a Mac port, and the Linux version as Randy >> > mentioned >> > is unstable. The Linux version is not native - it is the Windows version >> > running in a heavily customized version of WINE. >> > >> > >> > >> > On Apr 13, 2011, at 11:17 AM, Randy Little wrote: >> > >> > Nah fusion does a pretty good job. its just has crap support. Fusion >> > 3d >> > and full openCL acceleration make it not horrible. but support is weird >> > and >> > some of the tools are weird and its pretty much windows only. Linux >> > version >> > has a history of unstable. >> > >> > >> > Randy S. Little >> > http://reel.rslittle.com >> > http://imdb.com/name/nm2325729/ >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 12:09, andrei gheorghiu <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> There is no other product like Nuke at the present moment...and Nuke >> >> was, >> >> since the begining, an extremely well developed tool. >> >> >> >> It is very hard to compete with this....I don't see toady a legitimate >> >> competitor. >> >> >> >> But wait.... >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Nuke-users mailing list >> >> [email protected] >> >> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >> >> >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Nuke-users mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Nuke-users mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> Nuke-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users > > > _______________________________________________ > Nuke-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users > > _______________________________________________ Nuke-users mailing list [email protected] http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
