If they where expecting anything else then they haven't been paying attention to how Ubilos does things. He Quit Adobe to Make KeyGrip (fcp) FCP 1.0 was accepted about as well as FCP X. Will FCP X ever be awesome? We will see. But to claim its not a professional app. Well that depends on your profession I guess. Event editors are professionals. As Deke has said many many times. We are a minority.
Randy S. Little http://www.rslittle.com <http://reel.rslittle.com> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 17:27, [email protected] < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi Gene, don't want to start a flame war here, as I haven't even used > the new FinalCut, but I'm guessing that he big issue is that it is not > really a v1.0 application, in that people expected it to be FinalCut > 8. If they wanted a v1.00 application they could be using anything > else... > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Gene Crucean > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I agree it's missing a few pro-required features... but that wasn't my > > point. I was talking more about peoples reaction to a v1.0 application... > > regardless of owner or application. > > Imagine if all of the Softimage (sorry this is the best example I can > think > > of right now) users had the same reaction to XSI v1.0. It wouldn't be > around > > anymore. People would have bailed long before getting all of the wicked > > stuff it has now. XSI v1.0 was barely able to function in a professional > > environment, but now it's full blown. It's a developing platform > basically. > > > > Ned: Because The Foundry has such an awesome parent now? Heh. And > Autodesk? > > Yeah they are trust worthy. What were you saying about Toxik? ;) There is > > some funky logic around here lately. > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 3:55 PM, jaden < > [email protected]> > > wrote: > >> > >> maybe you re right. i am actually no cutter and maybe all the people are > >> wrong and apple is heading somewhere ?! i dont know. i just know that i > for > >> myself was disappointed what apple delivered beacuse i thought the > script > >> could be expanded. like supporting imagesequences and stuff... > >> > >> right now, its far away from being professional and thats not jumping > >> after everyone else. its a fact. > >> > >> > >> PS: I didnt even want to bring this topic up. like i said i am no cutter > >> and i dont care what they use. > >> After all I wanted to show the script and show what is possible with > nuke > >> and XML. Like I said I hope to be able to get the script working with > every > >> tool that supports xml. Than everybody can use what serves their needs > best. > >> > >> jaden > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Nuke-users mailing list > >> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > >> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users > > > > > > > > -- > > [Gene Crucean] - [VFX & CG Supervisor/Generalist] > > ** Freelance for hire ** > > > > ~~ This email address is ONLY my email for lists. If you want to send a > > personal email to me and do not know my main email address, please use my > > website's contact form. www.genecrucean.com. Thanks. ~~ > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Nuke-users mailing list > > [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users > > > _______________________________________________ > Nuke-users mailing list > [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >
_______________________________________________ Nuke-users mailing list [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
