Hi, what Deke said is spot on... however if you have a few still shots from the place you could use something like PFTRACk and use all the different shots to help your camera track and get some depth in the point cloud...
hope this helps 2011/11/26 Deke Kincaid <[email protected]> > The results you are getting is a limitation of the type of camera move you > are doing(nodal pan). The trouble with this type of move is that there > isn't any paralax changes in order to figure out where features are in > depth from the camera. Therefore you get that of wall of pixels. If you > physically move the camera in x/z enough, then you could get some depth > data. > > -deke > > On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 12:56, Jimbo55 > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> ** >> Hello Nuke Users >> I’m trying to get good camera tracking off of this video clip ( >> http://vimeo.com/32014549) It’s a spillway next to a lake. I have a >> front, top view of the data that I am getting from the tracking and it is >> not correct. What I’m getting is a wall of dots instead of getting data for >> the ground and the spillway. Is there a way to get better, if not correct >> camera data from the video? Thank you for your time. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Nuke-users mailing list >> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Nuke-users mailing list > [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >
_______________________________________________ Nuke-users mailing list [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
