Just curious for the amount of time it will take to do a work around and
how much syntheyes cost if it doesn't make sense to plead for a copy of
syntheyes

Also Manual track (user tracks) thats much easier to do over 6000 frames
then use those to solve.


Randy S. Little
http://reel.rslittle.com
http://imdb.com/name/nm2325729/
 <http://www.linkedin.com/in/rslittle>



On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 01:56, Stephen Newbold
<[email protected]>wrote:

> I just did this on a shot, although nowhere near 6000 frames!  Main
> problem is getting the resulting cameras from multiple tracks to line up in
> world space.
>
> Trick is to get as much accurate info about the camera with an initial
> track.  Once you have good values for this first camera you can use this as
> 'known' values in subsequent camera.  Each camera should be zeroed out on
> its first frame so I simply added the values from the last frame of the
> initial track to the first frame of the next track so they line up.  This
> seemed to work ok.  A better way might be to create some overlap frames and
> write a little gizmo that averages out the camera positions with an
> animated mix between the two.
>
> Steve
>
>
> Deke Kincaid wrote:
>
>> Did you try making a couple manual tracks on items in the shot where
>> it has issues?  That typically helps the solver span between areas of
>> trouble.
>>
>> -deke
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 16:08, Nic <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hi Everyone in nuke land,
>>>
>>> Ok so I am making a music video where the shot is entirely one take,
>>> nukes
>>> camera tracker is rather having a hissy fit tracking 6000frames+
>>>
>>> My thinking is to break the shot into several parts and then combine them
>>> together to create a single 3d scene combining the cameras into one take.
>>>
>>>
>>> Whats the best method of doing this? keeping the ground plane and camera
>>> orientation the same for all the cameras?
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>> -Nic
>>>
>>>
>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>> Nuke-users mailing list
>>> [email protected].**co.uk<[email protected]>,
>>> http://forums.thefoundry.co.**uk/ <http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/>
>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.**uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/**nuke-users<http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users>
>>>
>>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> Nuke-users mailing list
>> [email protected].**co.uk<[email protected]>,
>> http://forums.thefoundry.co.**uk/ <http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/>
>> http://support.thefoundry.co.**uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/**nuke-users<http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Stephen Newbold
> Compositing Lead - Film
> MPC
> 127 Wardour Street
> Soho, London, W1F 0NL
> Main - + 44 (0) 20 7434 3100
> www.moving-picture.com
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Nuke-users mailing list
> [email protected].**co.uk<[email protected]>,
> http://forums.thefoundry.co.**uk/ <http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/>
> http://support.thefoundry.co.**uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/**nuke-users<http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users>
>
_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
[email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users

Reply via email to