I don’t think anyone’s questioning the actual usability of 1.7... Sounds to me
like that’s just how versioning works in the OpenEXR project.
-Nathan
From: fnordware
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 6:29 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Nuke-users] Re: Luminance / Chroma B44 Compressed EXRs in Nuke
deke wrote:
Yes, in openexr even version number=stable and odd=unstable.
What, is this some sort of Star Trek every-other-release thing?
After Effects' EXR plug-in has used 1.7 since 2010. In fact, I was prompted to
upgrade to 1.7 when we found an issue with 1.6.1 on Windows. And of course I
also use 1.7 in my ProEXR plug-in for Photohshop.
In my opinion, 1.7 is perfectly stable. If anyone can identify an issue with
it, I'll gladly fix the bug myself. It is open source, after all.
Brendan
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
[email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
[email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
