Hey Sean,
I'm using the "rec709 (default)" from the viewer lut pulldown though
srgb has the same issue and I dont have any other view luts currently
installed. We have a custom OCIO config originating from opencolorio.org
A quick and clear test is to make an RGBA ramp and compare the RGB and
the A through different viewer luts and none.
If no one else is seeing it perhaps its to do with our OCIO setup.
Andrew
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 14:01:21 -0700
From: Sean Looper<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Nuke-users] 6.3v8 OCIO display lut
To: Nuke user discussion<[email protected]>
Message-ID:
<ca+dgjnax09z0blpa2xogbqr_ofdbkfw0ehwp2gg1h9z6dvp...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Hey Andrew,
Can you clarify a bit? In 6.3v8, the shipped LUTs seem to apply correctly
to non-rgba channels, but not to the alpha. This is the desired behavior.
At one point there was a bug in OCIO that caused the LUTs to only apply to
RGBA, but that fix seems to be picked up in Nuke 6.3v8. Which LUT are you
selecting in the Viewer LUT pulldown? Are you using a custom OCIO config or
the one that ships with Nuke?
Sean
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 12:18 PM,<[email protected]> wrote:
It appears that the forced OCIO display lut in 6.3v8 is only applying to
the RGB channels and not the alpha or other layers.
My "layer" option in the OCIOCDisplay panel is set to all. Though changing
this to other options doest not have any affect.
Anyone else experiencing this?
-Andrew
--
Compositing Supervisor
MIRADA
Purveyors of Handmade Storytelling,
Since 2010
4235 Redwood Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90066
+1 424 216 7470
mirada.com
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
This communication is confidential and may contain legally privileged
information related to Mirada. If you are not the named recipient, please
contact us immediately and delete this message and attachments. You must
not copy, use or disclose this communication, or any attachments or
information in it, without our prior consent. All opinions, conclusions and
other information expressed in this message not of an official nature shall
not be deemed as given or endorsed by Mirada unless otherwise indicated by
an authorized representative independent of this message.
______________________________**_________________
Nuke-users mailing list
[email protected].**co.uk<[email protected]>,
http://forums.thefoundry.co.**uk/<http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/>
http://support.thefoundry.co.**uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/**nuke-users<http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/private/nuke-users/attachments/20120629/797f3ea4/attachment-0001.htm
_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
[email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
