A exr2.0 deep image has an extra two 32-bit Z samples per deep sample in additional to the color channels - are you taking that into consideration when you wrote the first non-deep image?
On Jan 10, 2013, at 9:48 AM, Patrick Heinen wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I just stumbled across a little thing that got me wondering. What I'am doing > is to take a nonvolumetric deep image and apply a DeepToImage to basically > flatten it. Now I use that output and render it with a standard write node as > uncompressed exr 16bit. Secondly I use the output of the DeepToImage and plug > it into a DeepFromImage to get a deep image with a single sample per pixel. I > render that with a DeepWrite as uncompressed exr 16bit. Both are set to > render all channels, so that they contain the exact same information. My > expectation was that they should have the same or at least approximately the > same file size. However the deep exr is roundabout 1.5 times bigger than the > normal exr. > Is there anything I'm missing? Is there maybe some documentation on exr 2.0 > somewhere, like the technical introduction paper but for exr 2.0? > > cheers Patrick > _______________________________________________ > Nuke-users mailing list > [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users _______________________________________________ Nuke-users mailing list [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
