Hi Jonathan and Peter,

thanks a lot! That seems to sum up as it should like this. 
4*16(rgba)+2*16(deep) = 96, 4*16(rgba)+2*32(deep)+16?(samples) = 144. Turns out 
to be my 1.5 ratio.
Perfect thanks a lot!

cheers Patrick

----- Original Message -----
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Date: 11.01.2013 08:51:23
Subject: Re: [Nuke-users] deep file size exr 2.0


> On 10/01/13 20:28, Jonathan Egstad wrote:
>> A exr2.0 deep image has an extra two 32-bit Z samples per deep sample in 
>> additional to the color channels - are you taking that into consideration 
>> when you wrote the first non-deep image?
> 
> It's also got to save the number of samples per pixel, unlike the flat 
> version which has the number of channels specified for the entire image 
> - maybe it can specialise to work out they're all the same number for 
> the entire image / scanline, but probably not.
> 
> Peter
> -- 
> Peter Pearson, Software Engineer
> The Foundry, 6th Floor, The Communications Building,
> 48 Leicester Square, London, UK, WC2H 7LT
> Tel: +44 (0)20 7434 0449   Web: www.thefoundry.co.uk
> 
> The Foundry Visionmongers Ltd.
> Registered in England and Wales No: 4642027
> _______________________________________________
> Nuke-users mailing list
> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users

_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
[email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users

Reply via email to