I've never seen Alexa footage that does that

On 28 March 2013 12:56, Igor Majdandzic <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hey guys,****
>
> we got footage from a shoot with Alexa being the camera. It was shot in
> ProRess 444. The problem is: The picture has some artifacts which confuse
> me the codec being 444. I attached some images which show some of the grain
> patterns. Is this normal?****
>
> ** **
>
> thx,****
>
>                 Igor****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> -- ****
>
> igor majdandzic****
>
> compositor |****
>
> [email protected]****
>
> BadgerFX | www.badgerfx.com****
>
> ** **
>
> *Von:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *Im Auftrag von *Deke Kincaid
> *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 27. März 2013 23:47
> *An:* Nuke user discussion
> *Betreff:* Re: [Nuke-users] FusionI/O and Nuke****
>
> ** **
>
> Hi Michael****
>
> I'm actually testing this right now as Fusionio just gave us a bunch of
> them.  Early tests reveal that with dpx it's awesome but with openexr zip
> compressed file it it is spending more time with compression, not sure if
> it is cpu bound or what(needs more study but its slower).  Openexr
> uncompressed files though are considerably superfast but of course the
> issue is that it is 18 meg a frame.  These are single layer rgba exr files.
> ****
>
>
> ****
>
> -----
> Deke Kincaid
> Creative Specialist
> The Foundry
> Mobile: (310) 883 4313
> Tel: (310) 399 4555 - Fax: (310) 450 4516
>
> The Foundry Visionmongers Ltd.
> Registered in England and Wales No: 4642027****
>
> ** **
>
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Michael Garrett <[email protected]>
> wrote:****
>
> I'm evaluating one of these at the moment and am interested to know if
> others have got it working with Nuke nicely, meaning, have you been able to
> really utilise the insane bandwidth of this card to massively accelerate
> any part of your day to day compositing?****
>
> ** **
>
> So far, I've found it has no benefit when localising all Reads in a
> somewhat heavy comp, or even playing back a sequence of exr's or deep
> files, compared to localised sequences on a 10K Raptor drive also in my
> workstation - hopefully I'm missing something big though, this is day one
> after all.  ****
>
> ** **
>
> There may be real tangible benefits to putting the Nuke cache on it though
> - I'll see how it goes.****
>
> ** **
>
> I'm also guessing that as gpu processing becomes more prevalent in Nuke
> that we will see a real speed advantage handing data from a card like this
> straight to the gpu.****
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks,****
>
> Michael****
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nuke-users mailing list
> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users****
>
> ** **
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nuke-users mailing list
> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>
_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
[email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users

Reply via email to