We've been having some problems with noise on some footages from Alexa, but nothing remotely near to that.
diogo On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 9:50 PM, Jonathan Egstad <[email protected]>wrote: > No idea, but it looks an awful lot like filtering from a slight resize > operation. > > -jonathan > > On Mar 27, 2013, at 5:29 PM, "Igor Majdandzic" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > do you mean in camera? because that was from the original qt footage**** > > ** ** > > -- **** > > igor majdandzic**** > > compositor |**** > > [email protected]**** > > BadgerFX | www.badgerfx.com**** > > ** ** > > *Von:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *Im Auftrag von *Jonathan > Egstad > *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 28. März 2013 01:10 > *An:* Nuke user discussion > *Cc:* Nuke user discussion > *Betreff:* Re: [Nuke-users] Alexa Artifacts**** > > ** ** > > Looks like a very slight resize was done.**** > > -jonathan**** > > > On Mar 27, 2013, at 4:56 PM, "Igor Majdandzic" <[email protected]> > wrote:**** > > Hey guys,**** > > we got footage from a shoot with Alexa being the camera. It was shot in > ProRess 444. The problem is: The picture has some artifacts which confuse > me the codec being 444. I attached some images which show some of the grain > patterns. Is this normal?**** > > **** > > thx,**** > > Igor**** > > **** > > **** > > **** > > -- **** > > igor majdandzic**** > > compositor |**** > > [email protected]**** > > BadgerFX | www.badgerfx.com**** > > **** > > *Von:* [email protected] [ > mailto:[email protected]<[email protected]>] > *Im Auftrag von *Deke Kincaid > *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 27. März 2013 23:47 > *An:* Nuke user discussion > *Betreff:* Re: [Nuke-users] FusionI/O and Nuke**** > > **** > > Hi Michael**** > > I'm actually testing this right now as Fusionio just gave us a bunch of > them. Early tests reveal that with dpx it's awesome but with openexr zip > compressed file it it is spending more time with compression, not sure if > it is cpu bound or what(needs more study but its slower). Openexr > uncompressed files though are considerably superfast but of course the > issue is that it is 18 meg a frame. These are single layer rgba exr files. > **** > > > **** > > ----- > Deke Kincaid > Creative Specialist > The Foundry > Mobile: (310) 883 4313 > Tel: (310) 399 4555 - Fax: (310) 450 4516 > > The Foundry Visionmongers Ltd. > Registered in England and Wales No: 4642027**** > > **** > > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Michael Garrett <[email protected]> > wrote:**** > > I'm evaluating one of these at the moment and am interested to know if > others have got it working with Nuke nicely, meaning, have you been able to > really utilise the insane bandwidth of this card to massively accelerate > any part of your day to day compositing?**** > > **** > > So far, I've found it has no benefit when localising all Reads in a > somewhat heavy comp, or even playing back a sequence of exr's or deep > files, compared to localised sequences on a 10K Raptor drive also in my > workstation - hopefully I'm missing something big though, this is day one > after all. **** > > **** > > There may be real tangible benefits to putting the Nuke cache on it though > - I'll see how it goes.**** > > **** > > I'm also guessing that as gpu processing becomes more prevalent in Nuke > that we will see a real speed advantage handing data from a card like this > straight to the gpu.**** > > **** > > Thanks,**** > > Michael**** > > > _______________________________________________ > Nuke-users mailing list > [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users**** > > **** > > <crop-plate.jpg>**** > > <crop-plate_areas.jpg>**** > > <crop-plate_areas-edgeDetect.jpg>**** > > _______________________________________________ > Nuke-users mailing list > [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users**** > > _______________________________________________ > Nuke-users mailing list > [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users > > > _______________________________________________ > Nuke-users mailing list > [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >
_______________________________________________ Nuke-users mailing list [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
