Holy Moley!
I thought i was doing well with 35G's of RAM...
For what its worth im running the quadro K5000, needed for Houdini, but
works a treat with Nuke.
Neil Rögnvaldr Scholes
www.neilscholes.com
+44 (0) 7977 456 197
On 14/01/14 16:55, Richard Bobo wrote:
Randy,
With the new GPU accreted nodes in Nuke and the discussions about
going more and more in that direction, I would think that having a
kick-ass graphics card is just as important. Also, more RAM can be a
biggie. I’m currently running with 64 GB - a luxury, I know! However,
a 6 month project I was working on needed about 32 GB, just to open up
the comps and get started, before tweaking or caching anything… (8^\
Rich
On Jan 14, 2014, at 11:14 AM, Randy Little <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
What is more important to Nuke on the graphics card. I'm not
loading MASSIVE scenes like I would on a feature project. So I am
looking at GTX 770 or nuke with 2GB of Ram. or might go with 680 or
even 580 if Ram is more imporant. I would just think that for normal
compute type use for filters that I dont' need 4-6GB of VRAM but
smoking fast clock.
Randy S. Little
http://www.rslittle.com/
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2325729/
_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>,
http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
[email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
[email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
