Yeah - sidefx tends to go with quadro as the 'supported' route for Houdini,
but i know the GTX cards are used a ton with Houdini, so i just played
it safe.
I realise its probably overkill with Nuke.
I want over 100GB of RAM now...........
Neil Rögnvaldr Scholes
www.neilscholes.com
+44 (0) 7977 456 197
On 14/01/14 17:59, Barry Berman wrote:
I'm interested of people really see an advantage on quadro vs the top
end gaming cards anymore. I use a gtx 690 in one machine and a gtx
780 in the other at home. At work I have a quadro 6000 in a pc and a
quadro 5000 in a mac. All behave about the same.
If you see a difference can you say how much, and in what kind of
projects.
Barry
Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device
-------- Original message --------
From: Randy Little <[email protected]>
Date: 01/14/2014 9:45 AM (GMT-08:00)
To: Nuke user discussion <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Nuke-users] GFX cards and Nuke
Yeah I didn't mean more Ram for nuke I meant 2GB card VS 4GB card for
CUDA and openCL. I know more is more for loading GEO.
My realflow box in the office has has 128GB of Ram but it also has
GTX 680. I see no need for quadro cards anymore for the work I tend
to have the CBR just isn't there.
Randy S. Little
http://www.rslittle.com/
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2325729/
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Neil Rögnvaldr Scholes
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Holy Moley!
I thought i was doing well with 35G's of RAM...
For what its worth im running the quadro K5000, needed for
Houdini, but works a treat with Nuke.
Neil Rögnvaldr Scholes
www.neilscholes.com <http://www.neilscholes.com>
+44 (0) 7977 456 197 <tel:%2B44%20%280%29%207977%20456%20197>
On 14/01/14 16:55, Richard Bobo wrote:
Randy,
With the new GPU accreted nodes in Nuke and the discussions about
going more and more in that direction, I would think that having
a kick-ass graphics card is just as important. Also, more RAM can
be a biggie. I’m currently running with 64 GB - a luxury, I know!
However, a 6 month project I was working on needed about 32 GB,
just to open up the comps and get started, before tweaking or
caching anything… (8^\
Rich
On Jan 14, 2014, at 11:14 AM, Randy Little
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
What is more important to Nuke on the graphics card. I'm not
loading MASSIVE scenes like I would on a feature project. So I
am looking at GTX 770 or nuke with 2GB of Ram. or might go with
680 or even 580 if Ram is more imporant. I would just think
that for normal compute type use for filters that I dont' need
4-6GB of VRAM but smoking fast clock.
Randy S. Little
http://www.rslittle.com/
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2325729/
_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>,
http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>,http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>,
http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
[email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
[email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
