I'm late to the party but.. The Sense from Cubify is shit. It's not even close to prosumer / consumer level. Check Ben Hecks podcast to see how finicky it is.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TLFonu92Wn4 disclaimer: I have one, was part of a package deal, would never buy one on it's own. On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Chris Noellert <cnoell...@gmail.com> wrote: > Photoscan. Horrible learning materials and interface but it does what it > says on the tin and surprisingly well. > > Best, > Chris > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Jun 30, 2014, at 6:52 PM, Michael Garrett <michaeld...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Can you recommend a particular photogrammetry-based tool that creates > dense point clouds? Obviously there is Nuke's internal toolset which has > provided great results on occasion and I haven't fully exploited it yet. > > > On 30 June 2014 04:42, David Yu <dave...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Sense and all the Depth sensor type of scanner is like the Kinect. Low >> res, near field scanning. No more than 10 feet range and very noisy scans. >> >> Kinect and Asus Xtion Pro Live 640 x 480 resolution depth sensor. Data >> is really not usable for pro work. >> >> Better off using Photogrammetry tools for "Lidar" like scans. It's not >> realtime but the output is much better and gives a dense point cloud with >> textured mesh. Photogrammetry have no scale limits. Use a drone chopper and >> scan your neighbourhood :) >> >> >> >> Regards. >> Dave >> >> >> >> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Frank Rueter|OHUfx <fr...@ohufx.com> >> wrote: >> >>> just by a few zeros ;) >>> >>> >>> On 29/06/14 16:46, HSK wrote: >>> >>> Yikes! >>> >>> Apparently I was waaaaaaay off! >>> >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> On Jun 28, 2014, at 11:00 PM, Frank Rueter|OHUfx <fr...@ohufx.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> The pricing of that one is actually around $25k. That does not >>> include the pay-as-you go data processing which I found a bit annoying. >>> This is the info I got recently from a vendor in Australia: >>> >>> ZEB1 is charged at $24,860 AUD (ex Tax, ex Shipping) for the handheld >>> unit. The data processing is charged using a pay-as-you-go model and you >>> buy processing credits as and when you need them. This allows a lot of >>> flexibility and means you don’t have a large upfront software cost or >>> annual maintenance charges. The credits are charged at $0.50 AUD (ex >>> Tax) per credit which is equivalent to 2m of data capture. Discounts are >>> available for larger depending on how many credits you purchase at once. >>> >>> >>> >>> I have attached a brochure for your information and also some links to >>> allow you to download some sample data below - you can download the data in >>> LAZ or PLY format. >>> >>> Exhibition Hall – >>> https://www.hightail.com/download/elNLQmtWUnI5eFVFSzhUQw >>> >>> 2 Story Building – >>> https://www.hightail.com/download/elNLQmtWUnJ0NjgxWjhUQw >>> >>> >>> >>> You can open the data in any software that can accept a pointcloud and >>> have a look at the data output. You can use Cloud Compare >>> www.cloudcompare.org (open source software) >>> >>> >>> >>> You may also be interested in reading an article written in LiDAR News >>> following a recent trial and evaluation by an American surveyor who >>> recently went on to purchase a system of his own. It may not be related to >>> your line of work, but it gives you an idea of the capabilities of the >>> system: >>> http://www.lidarnews.com/PDF/LiDARMagazine_Gutelius-Zeb1Review_Vol4No1.pdf >>> >>> >>> I hope this information is helpful. If you have any further queries >>> please don’t hesitate to contact me. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 29/06/14 14:09, HSK wrote: >>> >>> Hey Ari, >>> >>> You may be thinking of the >>> Zebedee? (Zeb1) >>> https://www.fxguide.com/quicktakes/meet-zebedee-handheld-lidar-scanning/ >>> >>> I think it's relatively cheap to buy ($200-$400) >>> But it uses a pay as you go model for processing the data. >>> >>> >From what I've heard the results are "okay", and "a little bit noisy" >>> >>> What do you want to use it for? >>> Could photogrammetry be an option? >>> >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> >>> On Jun 28, 2014, at 8:08 PM, Ari Rubenstein <a...@curvstudios.com> >>> <a...@curvstudios.com> wrote: >>> >>> Has anyone explored any of the burgeoning prosumer Lidar options out there >>> and have positive feedback ? >>> >>> There was a $1k or less Kickstarter Lidar project I read about last year >>> but can't recall the company name, anyone ? >>> >>> Thx >>> Ari >>> Blue Sky >>> >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone_______________________________________________ >>> Nuke-users mailing listnuke-us...@support.thefoundry.co.uk, >>> http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Nuke-users mailing listnuke-us...@support.thefoundry.co.uk, >>> http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >>> >>> >>> -- >>> <ohufxLogo_50x50.png> <http://www.ohufx.com> *vfx compositing >>> <http://ohufx.com/index.php/vfx-compositing> | workflow customisation and >>> consulting <http://ohufx.com/index.php/vfx-customising> * >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Nuke-users mailing list >>> Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Nuke-users mailing listnuke-us...@support.thefoundry.co.uk, >>> http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >>> >>> >>> -- >>> <ohufxLogo_50x50.png> <http://www.ohufx.com> *vfx compositing >>> <http://ohufx.com/index.php/vfx-compositing> | workflow customisation and >>> consulting <http://ohufx.com/index.php/vfx-customising> * >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Nuke-users mailing list >>> Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Nuke-users mailing list >> Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >> > > _______________________________________________ > Nuke-users mailing list > Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users > > > _______________________________________________ > Nuke-users mailing list > Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users > -- | Aruna | X2018
_______________________________________________ Nuke-users mailing list Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
