Agisoft. Cubify is crap. Is crappier than the Kinect.
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 12:39 AM, Aruna Inversin <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm late to the party but.. The Sense from Cubify is shit. It's not even > close to prosumer / consumer level. Check Ben Hecks podcast to see how > finicky it is. > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TLFonu92Wn4 > > disclaimer: I have one, was part of a package deal, would never buy one on > it's own. > > > On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Chris Noellert <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Photoscan. Horrible learning materials and interface but it does what it >> says on the tin and surprisingly well. >> >> Best, >> Chris >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Jun 30, 2014, at 6:52 PM, Michael Garrett <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Can you recommend a particular photogrammetry-based tool that creates >> dense point clouds? Obviously there is Nuke's internal toolset which has >> provided great results on occasion and I haven't fully exploited it yet. >> >> >> On 30 June 2014 04:42, David Yu <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Sense and all the Depth sensor type of scanner is like the Kinect. Low >>> res, near field scanning. No more than 10 feet range and very noisy scans. >>> >>> Kinect and Asus Xtion Pro Live 640 x 480 resolution depth sensor. Data >>> is really not usable for pro work. >>> >>> Better off using Photogrammetry tools for "Lidar" like scans. It's not >>> realtime but the output is much better and gives a dense point cloud with >>> textured mesh. Photogrammetry have no scale limits. Use a drone chopper and >>> scan your neighbourhood :) >>> >>> >>> >>> Regards. >>> Dave >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Frank Rueter|OHUfx <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> just by a few zeros ;) >>>> >>>> >>>> On 29/06/14 16:46, HSK wrote: >>>> >>>> Yikes! >>>> >>>> Apparently I was waaaaaaay off! >>>> >>>> >>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>> >>>> On Jun 28, 2014, at 11:00 PM, Frank Rueter|OHUfx <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> The pricing of that one is actually around $25k. That does not >>>> include the pay-as-you go data processing which I found a bit annoying. >>>> This is the info I got recently from a vendor in Australia: >>>> >>>> ZEB1 is charged at $24,860 AUD (ex Tax, ex Shipping) for the handheld >>>> unit. The data processing is charged using a pay-as-you-go model and you >>>> buy processing credits as and when you need them. This allows a lot of >>>> flexibility and means you don’t have a large upfront software cost or >>>> annual maintenance charges. The credits are charged at $0.50 AUD (ex >>>> Tax) per credit which is equivalent to 2m of data capture. Discounts are >>>> available for larger depending on how many credits you purchase at once. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I have attached a brochure for your information and also some links to >>>> allow you to download some sample data below - you can download the data in >>>> LAZ or PLY format. >>>> >>>> Exhibition Hall – >>>> https://www.hightail.com/download/elNLQmtWUnI5eFVFSzhUQw >>>> >>>> 2 Story Building – >>>> https://www.hightail.com/download/elNLQmtWUnJ0NjgxWjhUQw >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> You can open the data in any software that can accept a pointcloud and >>>> have a look at the data output. You can use Cloud Compare >>>> www.cloudcompare.org (open source software) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> You may also be interested in reading an article written in LiDAR News >>>> following a recent trial and evaluation by an American surveyor who >>>> recently went on to purchase a system of his own. It may not be related to >>>> your line of work, but it gives you an idea of the capabilities of the >>>> system: >>>> http://www.lidarnews.com/PDF/LiDARMagazine_Gutelius-Zeb1Review_Vol4No1.pdf >>>> >>>> >>>> I hope this information is helpful. If you have any further queries >>>> please don’t hesitate to contact me. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 29/06/14 14:09, HSK wrote: >>>> >>>> Hey Ari, >>>> >>>> You may be thinking of the >>>> Zebedee? (Zeb1) >>>> https://www.fxguide.com/quicktakes/meet-zebedee-handheld-lidar-scanning/ >>>> >>>> I think it's relatively cheap to buy ($200-$400) >>>> But it uses a pay as you go model for processing the data. >>>> >>>> >From what I've heard the results are "okay", and "a little bit noisy" >>>> >>>> What do you want to use it for? >>>> Could photogrammetry be an option? >>>> >>>> >>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>> >>>> >>>> On Jun 28, 2014, at 8:08 PM, Ari Rubenstein <[email protected]> >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Has anyone explored any of the burgeoning prosumer Lidar options out there >>>> and have positive feedback ? >>>> >>>> There was a $1k or less Kickstarter Lidar project I read about last year >>>> but can't recall the company name, anyone ? >>>> >>>> Thx >>>> Ari >>>> Blue Sky >>>> >>>> >>>> Sent from my iPhone_______________________________________________ >>>> Nuke-users mailing [email protected], >>>> http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Nuke-users mailing [email protected], >>>> http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> <ohufxLogo_50x50.png> <http://www.ohufx.com> *vfx compositing >>>> <http://ohufx.com/index.php/vfx-compositing> | workflow customisation and >>>> consulting <http://ohufx.com/index.php/vfx-customising> * >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Nuke-users mailing list >>>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Nuke-users mailing [email protected], >>>> http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> <ohufxLogo_50x50.png> <http://www.ohufx.com> *vfx compositing >>>> <http://ohufx.com/index.php/vfx-compositing> | workflow customisation and >>>> consulting <http://ohufx.com/index.php/vfx-customising> * >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Nuke-users mailing list >>>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >>>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Nuke-users mailing list >>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Nuke-users mailing list >> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Nuke-users mailing list >> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >> > > > > -- > | Aruna | X2018 > > > _______________________________________________ > Nuke-users mailing list > [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >
_______________________________________________ Nuke-users mailing list [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
