Well done, Nathan, you beat me to it.
I'll join shortly.

R
 On 3 Feb 2015 20:44, "Howard Jones" <[email protected]> wrote:

> It doesn’t *have* to happen of course.
> Then a better solution could be formed that we would use, and then that
> implemented.
>
>
>
> On 3 Feb 2015, at 18:34, Gary Jaeger <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Thanks Emma-
>
> I appreciate that it’s happening, and I’m sure it’s not easy to take the
> heat being generated here. But the fact is, that model is not the best way
> to learn from the group. Maybe we’re just a bunch of old school forum
> deniers, but in practice I just end up ignoring the whole thing. It’s silly
> to say ‘just go and subscribe to the thread”. It’s almost always the
> REPLIES that are interesting, not the initial question.
>
> Gary Jaeger // Core Studio
> 249 Princeton Avenue
> Half Moon Bay, CA 94019
> 650 728 7060
> http://corestudio.com
>
> On Feb 3, 2015, at 10:25 AM, Emma Handley <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> You can subscribe to the forums and you will get a notification when a new
> topic is created. You can also subscribe to a topic and then choose how
> often you get an email sent too.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nuke-users mailing list
> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nuke-users mailing list
> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>
_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
[email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users

Reply via email to