Hey yes I do have raw checked…. double checked…… crazy negative values
weird one I’m having to resort to standard nuke and use the basic colorspace node to convert from Arri LogC - shame really as i’d prefer ACES. I think its either a bug or the plate. Neil Rögnvaldr Scholes Director | VFX Supervisor www.neilscholes.com <http://www.neilscholes.com/> +44 (0) 7977 456 197 > On 28 Oct 2016, at 18:38, Haarm-Pieter Duiker <l...@duikerresearch.com> wrote: > > Hey, > > Do you have 'raw data' checked on the read node? If you don't, Nuke apply > it's own linearization when the data is read in, at which point the data > flowing through the graph is no longer LogC encoded. > > Not checking that box could lead to problems like you're describing. > > HP > > > > On Friday, October 28, 2016, Neil Scholes <n...@uvfilms.co.uk > <mailto:n...@uvfilms.co.uk>> wrote: > Hi > > So I’m looking at supposed ARRI LogC footage - dpx's > > In ACES (1.0.1) converting from ARRI V3 LogC (EI800) Wide Gamut to ACEScg > gives me horrible negative values …..big ones > > So I’m wondering - is there a bug with ARRI V3 LogC and ACES currently?, or > is it likely that the plate is not actually LogC ? > > Thanks for any pointers > > N > > > > Neil Rögnvaldr Scholes > > Director | VFX Supervisor > > www.neilscholes.com <http://www.neilscholes.com/> > > +44 (0) 7977 456 197 > > _______________________________________________ > Nuke-users mailing list > Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
_______________________________________________ Nuke-users mailing list Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
